Border wall: Judge tells US to pay costs of reuniting immigrant families

The judge also agreed to impose timelines on the government for reporting details about its reunification efforts.

Published: 14th July 2018 09:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 14th July 2018 09:00 AM   |  A+A-


A woman holds up a protest poster with a message that reads in Spanish: 'Trump, Not one more immigrant child separated from her family!,' outside the campaign headquarters of Mexican President-elect Andres Lopez Obrador, in Mexico City | AP

By Reuters

A US judge in California on Friday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to pay the costs of reuniting immigrant parents with children separated from them by officials at the US-Mexican border, rather than forcing the parents to pay.

The US government is working to reunite around 2,000 children with their parents, who were detained and separated as part of Trump's "zero tolerance" approach to deter illegal immigration.

"It doesn't make any sense for any of the parents who have been separated to pay for anything," US District Judge Dana Sabraw, who last month ordered that the children be reunited with their parents by July 26, said at a hearing in San Diego.

The government missed a deadline this week for getting the youngest of the children back with their parents.

Trump has made his hardline immigration policies a central part of his presidency.

His administration adopted the family separation policy as part of its effort to discourage illegal immigration, but Trump bowed to intense political pressure and abandoned the policy on June 20.

A lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, which has sued the administration over the family separations, said at the hearing that immigrant parents had been told by immigration officials they had to pay for their travel.

One parent was initially asked to pay $1,900 to be reunited with a child, according to ACLU court papers.

Trump administration lawyer Sarah Fabian called the judge's order on paying for the reunifications "a huge ask on HHS," referring to the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Fabian said those decisions were handled at the field level, adding that HHS, which houses the detained children, had limited resources.

"The government will make it happen," Sabraw responded.

The judge also agreed to impose timelines on the government for reporting details about its reunification efforts.

The administration has said its initial reunifications were slowed by the need for DNA testing and criminal background checks on parents, and to determine their fitness to care for their children.

In a filing with the court, HHS official Chris Meekins said the administration had streamlined its vetting procedures to comply with a July 10 court order, but that the swifter process could put children at risk.

Adults are no longer being DNA tested to verify parentage, Meekins said, and background checks are not being performed on adults who will be living with the children.

Meekins said that, while abbreviated vetting speeds up the reunification process, it also "materially increases the risk of harm to children" and could result in children being placed in abusive environments or with adults who are not their parents.

The government said it intends to identify between six and eight locations where all reunifications will take place.

The government's filing did not say whether it intends to release families after reunification, deport them or keep them together in detention.


Stay up to date on all the latest World news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp