Kin of boy who drowned in pit awarded Rs 23 lakh

The court said that the negligence by the Northern Railway, as well as the contractor, led to the loss of life of an innocent boy as the site had no safety guard or safety measures to keep people out.

Image used for representational purpose (Express Illustrations)

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has awarded Rs 23 lakh as compensation to the family of a 12-year-old boy who died after drowning in a water-filled ditch dug up by a private contractor for work being carried out for the Northern Railway in 2013.

A bench headed by Justice Najmi Waziri said negligence by the Northern Railway, as well as the contractor, led to the loss of life of an innocent boy as the site neither had a safety guard nor measures were taken to prevent any living being from wandering towards it.

“The respondents (Northern Railway and contractor) were neither vigilant nor sensitive in taking appropriate safety measures at the site to avoid any unfortunate accident. It was the duty of the respondents to take proper diligence and care at the site to avoid any accident..Their negligence led to the loss of life of an innocent boy,” said the bench, also comprising Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain, in an order passed recently.

The deceased resided with his family in a shanty in Kailash Nagar here and the incident occurred at a place between Pilli Mitti railway line and the metro line, where the children of the locality played. “Children used to play in the open unhindered area. Nothing has been brought on record to show that the children were cautioned or restrained or forewarned from playing in the open filed. A young boy of about 12 years does not know the difference between a railways land or land of other civic agency,” stated the court.

“The children of the locality used to play on said open land in which the unsecured rainy well was dug up; while playing in the said area the boy of 12 years fell into the pit/trench and lost his life,” it added. The court was delivering its judgement on an appeal by the family against the decision of a single judge of the high court rejecting their petition seeking Rs 15 lakh as compensation on the ground that a sum of over Rs 3 lakh had already been paid to them by the contractor pursuant to a settlement to close the criminal proceedings against him.