Madras High Court quashes case against Dhanush for 2014 film poster showing him smoking

The Court held that the complaint did not constitute an offence under Section 5 of COTPA, 2003, which prohibits the promotion/use/consumption of cigarettes or any other tobacco products.
Screengrab from the movie ' Velaiyilla Pattadhari'.
Screengrab from the movie ' Velaiyilla Pattadhari'.

CHENNAI:  The Madras High Court on Monday quashed the criminal proceedings against film star Dhanush and Aishwarya Rajinikanth that was pending before a magistrate court in the city, for allegedly showing banners of the Tamil film Velaiyilla Pattadhari, carrying a picture of Dhanush prominently smoking a cigarette.

Justice N Anand Venkatesh allowed the petitions filed by Dhanush, Aiswarya and three others. Originally, on a private complaint filed by S Cyril Alexander, the proceedings were initiated against Dhanush and Aishwarya.

In his order, the judge said in the instant case, the only allegation that has been made in the complaint is that the advertisement banners of the movie were found to carry the picture of the lead actor prominently smoking a cigarette.

This act, per se, cannot be brought within the purview of Section 5 of the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, production, supply and Distribution) Act (COPTA) since the display was not done by persons engaged in the production, supply or distribution of cigarettes or any other tobacco products, the judge said.

The person who is depicted as smoking a cigarette was not under any contract with the entity or the person engaged in the production, supply or distribution of cigarettes or any other tobacco products nor he was promoting their product, the judge added.

“Hence, this court cannot be swayed by emotions and popular beliefs and the court has to necessarily construe the provisions strictly and see if the facts of the case make out an offence. If the facts do not constitute an offence, the court cannot try to expand the scope of the provision by considering the adverse impact that a tobacco or tobacco product can have on society and particularly the younger generation,” the judge added.

“In the light of the above discussions, the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the accused persons will amount to an abuse of process of court, and hence, it requires the interference of this court,” the judge added and quashed the proceedings.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com