Sabarimala women's entry: Over to five-judge constitution bench

The apex court have ref­e­r­red to a constitution bench the iss­u­e relating to the ban on entry of wo­m­en aged between 10 and 50 years to Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple.
Sabarimala temple
Sabarimala temple
Updated on
1 min read

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday ref­e­r­red to a constitution bench the iss­u­e relating to the ban on entry of wo­m­en aged between 10 and 50 years to Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple and framed five questions for the bench to look at.

The questions, drawn up by a b­e­n­ch headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, will decide whether the rights of women, especially their fundame­n­tal right to religious freedom and to pray at a place of their choice, can be infringed upon by the temple mana­g­ed by the Travancore Devaswom Bo­ard.

The management of the Sabarim­al­a temple had told the apex court that the ban was because women bet­ween 10 and 50 years cannot mainta­in purity during men­­s­t­r­u­a­t­i­o­n. The Travancore Dewaswom Bo­a­r­d justified the restriction on the gr­ounds that the deity, Lord Ayyapa, was a celibate.

It said that a 1,0­00-year-old custom and religious pr­actice could not be interfered with. The Kerala government had told the court that women of all ages should be allowed entry into the Sabarimala Ayyappa temple without any restriction.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com