Azam Khan's remark on Bulandshahr gangrape comes under scanner

Supreme Court today took note of the alleged controversial statement of UP minister Azam Khan that the Bulandshahr gangrape of a mother and her daughter was a \'political conspiracy\'.

Published: 29th August 2016 04:55 PM  |   Last Updated: 29th August 2016 04:55 PM   |  A+A-


Azam Khan | PTI Photo


NEW DELHI: Supreme Court today took note of the alleged controversial statement of UP minister Azam Khan that the Bulandshahr gangrape of a mother and her daughter was a "political conspiracy" and sought his and the SP government's response on a plea to shift the probe and trial in the case out of the state due to "distrust".

The brutal incident had happened on the night of July 29 when a group of highway robbers stopped the car of a Noida- based family and sexually assaulted the woman and her daughter after dragging them out of the vehicle at gun-point, The bench of justices Dipak Misra and C Nagappan appointed jurist and senior lawyer F S Nariman as amicus curiae (friend of the court), as it framed some legal questions with regard to freedom of speech and expression and probable impact of statements of those holding high offices on free and fair probe in heinous cases like this.

The bench noted the apprehensions of the victim family, represented by lawyer Kislay Pandey, that there was no possibility of a "fair investigation" in Uttar Pradesh in view of the fact that a Minister has allegedly made a public statement that it was a "political conspiracy".

Framing the questions for its adjudication, the bench said "when a victim files an FIR alleging rape/gangrape/murder or such other heinous offences against a person or a group of persons, whether any individual, holding a high office or who is in authority, should make a comment on the crime that it was an outcome of political conspiracy, moreover when he has nothing to do with the offence."

It further said whether the state, which is "the protector of citizens", should allow these comments which can have an effect or "may create distrust" with regard to fair investigation in such cases.

The bench, while framing another question, said it would examine whether such statements are covered under the freedom of speech and expression of an individual.

It further said the statements, which are not given for self protection, comply with the concept of "constitutional sensitivities". The plea will now be taken up after three weeks.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp