Arun Jaitley slaps another Rs 10 crore defamation suit against Arvind Kejriwal after Ram Jethmalani abuses him
Jaitley filed the fresh suit after Kejriwal's counsel Ram Jethmalani allegedly abused him in open court during the proceedings of another defamation suit he had filed against the AAP chief.
NEW DELHI: Union Minister Arun Jaitley today filed a fresh defamation suit of Rs 10 crore against Arvind Kejriwal over the use of an "objectionable" word by Delhi Chief Minister's lawyer Ram Jethmalani in the Delhi High Court recently.
Jaitley, who holds twin portfolios of Finance and Defence, filed the second defamation suit after Kejriwal's counsel Jethmalani allegedly "abused" him in open court during the proceedings of another defamation suit he had filed against the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief and five other party functionaries.
During the cross-examination of the Minister on May 17 before Joint Registrar in the Delhi High Court, Jethmalani had used a term Jaitley had found objectionable.
A day after, Justice Manmohan, who was hearing a connected matter, had termed as "scandalous" certain remarks made by Jethmalani against Jaitley before the Joint Registrar during the cross-examination.
Terming the word as not only "false, baseless, malicious and abusive, but is per se defamatory", Jaitley in his fresh suit stated that he was "subjected to numerous questions, terminologies/statements that are ex-facie abusive, malicious, offensive, irrelevant and slanderous".
"Clearly, the defendant (Kejriwal) has brazenly and with a malafide intent to cause further prejudice, damage and loss to the name, reputation and credibility of plaintiff (Jaitley) has deliberately used the terminology against him," the second law suit filed through advocate Manik Dogra said.
The suit said the union minister enjoyed a reputation of honesty and probity and has sacrificed large professional earnings in order to undertake public service.
"These per se defamatory statements made on specific and categorical instructions of the defendant are politically motivated to cause serious damages to the reputation of the Plaintiff in an entirely irreversible manner.
"As such, the defendant has made himself liable for irreversible and uncountable damage caused to the plaintiff and is liable to compensate the plaintiff by a sum of Rs 10 crore," the suit said.
Jethmalani, who was expelled from BJP for six years in 2013, had told the Joint Registrar that he used such words against Jaitley during the proceedings on instructions of Kejriwal.
However, Anupam Srivastav, advocate on record for Kejriwal, had submitted that there was no instruction on the use of the word by the Chief Minister.
The court proceedings had ended abruptly following the heated exchanges between the lawyers of Jaitley and Kejriwal.
Jaitley had warned Jethmalani then that he will aggravate the charges against Kejriwal.
The senior BJP leader's cross-examination remained inconclusive and will now take place on July 28 and July 31.
The AAP leaders had accused the BJP leader of corruption as the President of the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA), a post he had held from 2000 to 2013.
Jaitley, who had denied all the allegations levelled by the AAP leaders in December 2015, had filed a civil defamation suit seeking Rs 10 crore damages from Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders, claiming they had made "false and defamatory" statements in the case involving DDCA, thereby harming his reputation.
The AAP leaders had allegedly attacked Jaitley and his family members in various fora, including social media, over the alleged irregularities and financial bungling in the DDCA.
The five other accused in the first defamation case are Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai.
Besides the civil defamation suit, Jaitley had also filed a separate criminal defamation case in the trial court against the AAP leaders.