Supreme Court clarifies highway liquor ban exemption is pan-India

The apex court said that the ban on sale of liquor did not extend to municipal areas and that licensed establishments along highways which fell within municipal areas could continue to operate.

Published: 13th November 2017 09:14 PM  |   Last Updated: 13th November 2017 09:14 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court (File photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Putting to rest all confusion regarding exemption from December 2016 ban on sale of liquor along the highways, the Supreme Court on Monday clarified that its July 11 order granting such exemption to liquor outlets, bars and restaurants operating in municipal areas was applicable to the entire country.

The court had in its July order said that its ban on sale of liquor within a distance of 500 metres along national and state highways did not extend to municipal areas and that licensed establishments along highways which fell within municipal areas could continue to operate.

The clarification was made by a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra after senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Tamil Nadu government, pointed out that there was some confusion about the scope of exemption since the July order had come on a petition filed by a Chandigarh-based NGO.

A Madras High Court Division Bench headed by Chief Justice Indira Banerjee¸ while hearing a PIL, had asked the Tamil Nadu government to approach the apex court and seek clarity on whether or not it was entitled to open state-run liquor shops on highways passing through city and town limits without declassifying them.

“The high court says ‘municipal areas’ in the apex court order means only areas in Punjab and not in Chennai. The Chief Justice Bench of the High Court wants a clarification whether the exemption applies only to Chandigarh,” Rohatgi told the SC.

The CJI-led Bench then clarified that the exemption was for all municipal areas across the country. “Why should the High Court think that? If our order applies for municipal areas in Chandigarh, it will apply equally for municipal areas across the country,” the CJI observed.

Rohtagi then read the part of the July order which had created the confusion. It said, “The purpose of the directions contained in the order dated December 15, 2016 is to deal with the sale of liquor along and in proximity of highways properly understood, which provide connectivity between cities, towns and villages. The order does not prohibit licensed establishments within municipal areas. This clarification shall govern other municipal areas as well. We have considered it appropriate to issue this clarification to set at rest any ambiguity and to obviate repeated recourse to interlocutory applications, before the court.”

This led Justice D Y Chadrachud to clarify, “The phrase ‘other municipal areas’ in the order means municipal areas across the country.”


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp