Avoid coercive action against Nalini Chidambaram in Saradha chit fund scam, Supreme Court tells ED

The ED had directed her to appear as a witness in its probe into alleged money laundering in the scam, in which several key politicians were said to be involved.
Nalini Chidambaram, wife of former Finance Minister P Chidambaram. | PTI File Photo
Nalini Chidambaram, wife of former Finance Minister P Chidambaram. | PTI File Photo

NEW DELHI: In a big reprieve to Nalini Chidambaram, wife of former Union minister P Chidambaram, in a case related to Saradha chit fund scam, the Supreme Court on Friday restrained the Enforcement Directorate from taking any coercive action against her. 

A bench of Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan also issued notice to the ED on her plea challenging the dismissal of her petition by the Madras High Court against ED summons in the case.

The Madras High Court on July 10 dismissed an appeal by Nalini Chidambaram against a single-judge bench’s order rejecting her plea challenging the ED summons.  In its order, the high court had said that Section 50 (2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) gave sufficient ammunition to an authority to summon any person whose attendance was considered necessary for investigation and had rejected her contention that women cannot be called for investigation out of their place of residence under CrPC Section 160, saying she was not entitled to invoke the section.

ED had issued the first summons in 2016, asking Nalini Chidambaram to appear before it at its Kolkata office. It subsequently issued fresh summons after the single judge’s order.

According to the investigating agency, Nalini was allegedly paid a legal fee of Rs 1 crore by the Saradha group for her appearances in court and the Company Law Board over a television channel purchase deal.In her appeal, she contended that if the trend of summoning and calling advocates who have been engaged by their clients for rendering professional services was not nipped in the bud, it may lead to “disastrous consequences”.

Related Stories

No stories found.
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com