STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

No prima facie evidence against IPS officer in Sohrabuddin case: Lawyer

The lawyer of Rajasthan IPS officeraccused in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case told the Bombay HC that the trial court discharged him because there was no prima facie evidence.

Published: 16th February 2018 12:23 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th February 2018 12:23 AM   |  A+A-

By PTI

MUMBAI: The lawyer of Rajasthan IPS officer Dinesh MN, named by the CBI as an accused in the Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case, told the Bombay High Court today that the trial court discharged him because there was no prima facie evidence.

Raja Thakre also pointed out that the CBI chose not to challenge the lower court's discharge order.

While discharging Dinesh last year, the special CBI court not only cited lack of official sanction for his prosecution, but also noted that there existed no prima facie evidence against him, the lawyer said.

"The same court rejected the discharge applications filed by three junior police officers who were alleged to have accompanied me (Dinesh) to the encounter site.

That is because the CBI had claimed they were the ones who shot at Sohrabuddin," Thakre said.

"The CBI failed to ascribe any distinct role to me and said merely that I had conspired to have Sohrabuddin and (his aide) Prajapati killed.

However, the CBI court held that there was no prima facie evidence to suggest I had been part of the conspiracy, much less that I had a role to play in the actual killings," he said.

Therefore, Dinesh's discharge was akin to "acquittal", the lawyer claimed.

According to the CBI, Dinesh was involved in the fake encounters of Sohrabuddin Shaikh, a gangster who allegedly had terror links, and his associate Tulsiram Prajapati.

Dinesh travelled, on November 24, 2005, from Udaipur to Ahmedabad for executing the encounter, the agency had said, adding that he was accompanied by three junior officers of Rajasthan Police -- Rehman Abdul Khan, Kartar Singh and Yudhvir Singh.

Dinesh's contention is that he had gone to Ahmedabad to attend an official training program.

"I had the permission of the director general of Rajasthan Police, I stayed at the government circuit house.

That proves that I had gone to Ahmedabad on official duty," his lawyer told the high court.

The high court is hearing, on a daily basis, applications filed by Sohrabuddin's brother Rubabuddin Shaikh, challenging the discharge of former deputy inspector-general of Gujarat D G Vanzara, Dinesh M N and Gujarat IPS officer Rajkumar Pandiyan.

The court is also hearing applications filed by the CBI challenging the discharge of Rajasthan Police constable Dalpat Singh Rathod and Gujarat Police officer N K Amin.

Meanwhile, three more prosecution witnesses turned hostile in the fake encounter cases' trial before the special CBI court here today.

The three witnesses refused to identify two farmhouses near Ahmedabad where Sohrabuddin and his wife Kausar Bi were allegedly kept before they were killed in fake encounter.

The panch witnesses said they had never been to the farmhouses, and had been just made to sign the panchnama (inspection report) by Gujarat Police.

A total of 33 witnesses has turned hostile in the case so far.

Sohrabuddin and Kausar Bi were killed in an alleged fake encounter by Gujarat Police in November 2005, while Prajapati was killed in another alleged fake encounter by the Gujarat and Rajasthan police in December 2006.

Of the 38 people charged by the CBI in the case, 15, including Vanzara, Pandiyan and Dinesh MN, and BJP president Amit Shah were discharged by the special CBI court.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp