STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Unelected people think they can impose will on govt through courts: Harish Salve 

He made the observation while asserting that one can criticise a judgment and even a judge, but attributing motives to them is wrong.

Published: 30th May 2020 03:34 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th May 2020 03:34 PM   |  A+A-

Senior advocate Harish Salve

Senior advocate Harish Salve (Photo | EPS)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: Noted jurist Harish Salve Friday said a lot of people who are not elected representatives feel that they can impose their will on the government through the courts.

He made the observation while asserting that one can criticise a judgment and even a judge, but attributing motives to them is wrong.

The senior advocate also said violation of privacy is a serious issue and that private data is a valuable property but Indians are not serious about it.

Salve, while speaking during a webinar on the issue of 'Insulting the Judiciary from Social Media Diatribes', said, "To say judgement is to favour a political party or judge has acted in favour of political party is wrong. Supreme Court is not a dartboard. You can criticise a judgment saying the judge has taken a conservative line."

Salve said some people have got used to pushing the Supreme Court for relief.

"When they do not get relief from Supreme Court, they say judges are not doing this because of this reason... Some people are pushing the boundaries by saying Supreme Court deserves 'F' grade for its handling of migrants. I have been reading these articles. They are wrong," Salve said.

"A lot of people who are not elected feel that they can impose their will on the government through courts. One can criticise that court saying that (in migrants' case) either the court should have intervened or not.. but to say that the court is scared of the government is wrong," he said.

"If I argue a case and I lose, I should think that I tried my best but I lost. But if I get a feeling that the judge did not not give a judgment in my favour because of ... what newspapers might write, then I am worried," he said.

The senior advocate also said that one may disagree with the court's judgment on whether 4G has to be allowed or not (in the context of Jammu and Kashmir), but to say that the Supreme Court has not stood with the people of the region is wrong.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments(3)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • R.RAMACHANDRAN

    In this country in so far have-not boldly pronouncing judgments in the manner of taking away the fundamental rights because there is no any one punish them under Section 219 of the IPC.In my case in the name of the Supreme Court too told that there is no any relief to provided to you because of you himself refused to working as bonded labour when in Article 23 of the Constitution of India prohibited the forced labour system.
    2 months ago reply
  • S R Lobo

    Justice done in Salman's hit and run case.
    2 months ago reply
  • A k Sehanobis

    You are on the dot
    2 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp