STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Nedumbassery FICN case: Fake note smuggling done before UAPA amendment not 'terrorist act', says  Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court has held the production or smuggling of high-quality counterfeit Indian paper currency in India committed prior to the enforcement of the amendment made to Section 15 of the Unla

Published: 26th April 2018 01:07 AM  |   Last Updated: 26th April 2018 05:33 AM   |  A+A-

Image for representational purpose only. (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

KOCHI: The Kerala High Court has held the production or smuggling of high-quality counterfeit Indian paper currency in India committed prior to the enforcement of the amendment made to Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) was not punishable as a 'terrorist act' mentioned under Section 18 of the Act.

A Full Bench of the court passed the order on the petition filed by Abdul Salam alias Podi Salam, the third accused in 2013's Nedumbassery fake Indian currency note (FICN) case Salam submitted the production or smuggling of fake notes to 'damage the monetary stability of India' was made punishable as a 'terrorist act' in the UAP Amendment Act of 2012 and the amendment was enforced on February 1, 2013.

“Since the crime was committed on January 26, 2013, before the amendments were enforced, prosecution under UAPA is illegal,” Salam submitted.

The Full Bench held the amended provisions of the Act could not be applied to deal with and punish import, circulation or smuggling of 'high-quality counterfeit Indian paper currency' prior to their enforcement on February 1, 2013. If the trial court has framed charges against the accused, the court shall alter them appropriately, provided there are no alternative charges under IPC.

The Bench also held on consideration of various relevant aspects, including the social and economic impact of the alleged offence and the wide network and conspiracy behind the deal, the trial court rightly denied bail to the accused.

“But the accused can approach the trial court during the trial. In case a bail plea is made afresh during the trial, the trial court can consider it on merits and take appropriate decisions after due consideration,” the Bench said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp