Madras HC notice to Centre, Tamil Nadu on Salem-Chennai Expressway project

The petitioner has claimed that the authorities have already started the land acquisition process even before receiving objections from those likely to be affected by it.

Published: 29th June 2018 12:48 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th June 2018 04:44 AM   |  A+A-

EPS file image of an Expressway used for representational purpose only.

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: A division bench of the Madras High Court has ordered notice to the authorities concerned on a PIL petition challenging Sec 105 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and the Fourth Schedule to the law as well as the entire land acquisition proceedings initiated under the National Highways Act, 1956, for implementing the Green Field Chennai-Salem Highway project.

A bench of Justices T S Sivagnanam and N Seshasayee, before which the PIL from NGO — Poovulagin Nanbargal — came up for hearing on Thursday, issued the notices, returnable by July 12. Earlier, Advocate-General Vijay Narayan told the bench that the benefits under the 2013 Act were already given to the land owners. In fact, they will be paid three to four times more the value of the land, he added.
Representing the Union government, Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan submitted that the petitioner was not affected by the notification and hence had no locus standi.

According to the organisation, the authorities concerned had already started proceedings under the National Highways Act in respect of the highway, even before receiving objections from the affected persons. It was only on June 11, the authorities issued the notification inviting objections within 21 days, the petitioner said.

The Right to Fair Compensation Act ensures a transparent process for land acquisition for industrialisation, development of essential infrastructural facilities and urbanisation with the least disturbance to the stake-holders.

But, contrary to the very object of the law, the impugned Sec105 of the Act provides that the provisions of the Act shall not apply to land acquisition under the enactments specified in the Fourth Schedule to the Act, which includes the National Highways Act, petitioner contended.

PIL dismissed
Chennai: A division bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed in limine, a PIL petition demanding that Metro Rail fares be reduced fixed on a par with the fares of suburban electric trains. According to the petitioner, one of the stipulations promised by the Bharatiya Janata Party in its election manifesto was fares on a par with the ones charged in suburban trains.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Raghu Chennai

    The people trust only the Judiciary and not the central Government or the StateGovernment which is now a SLAVE under the clutches of the passisist" dictatorship BJP Government in the centre The people have enormous power which they wasted in the election by selling their VOTES " The Poverty and illiteracy of the poor peasants and people are being exploited by all political parties TheSupreme Count Chief Jus tice using master rooster methods acts according to the whims An fancy the present Government at the centre SeniorAdvocater Mr Shanti Bhoosan had filed a case against the master rooster method of the CJI and this was enquired by a two Judges bench and was rejected ??????? by them The people were carefully observing the statement four senior most and efficient ??????? Judges on January 2018 which reads as follows " Democracy is in dangerous conditioens and the TheSupreme Court is not in order ". The 2019 Lokhsaba Election will definitely give a good solution
    3 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp