India Lifts Nokia Factory Freeze, Paving Way for Microsoft Deal

An Indian court accepted an appeal by Nokia to release its local factory after it was seized by authorities in a tax dispute, Microsoft is lucky to dodge Nokia's tax bill in India.
The Nokia Research and Development Centre is seen in Helsinki in this April 11, 2008 (File photo/Reuters)
The Nokia Research and Development Centre is seen in Helsinki in this April 11, 2008 (File photo/Reuters)

An Indian court on Thursday accepted an appeal by Nokia to release its local factory after it was seized by authorities in a tax dispute, removing a hurdle to the sale of the company's mobile phone business to Microsoft.

The plant in the southern city of Chennai is one of Nokia's biggest phone-making factories. Nokia had appealed the seizure and was scrambling to end the dispute ahead of the closure of the 5.4 billion euro ($7.4 billion) Microsoft deal.

The Delhi High Court asked the Finnish company to deposit 22.50 billion rupees ($367.17 million) in an escrow account as a condition for lifting the freeze and transferring the facility to Microsoft.

The tax demand case will continue separately. If Nokia loses it may have to pay as much as $3.4 billion, which includes penalties for non-payment of tax and interest, according to a tax department lawyer.

Nokia's case is one of several high-profile tax disputes involving foreign companies in India, which has stepped up its pursuit of claims against such firms as it seeks to rein in its budget deficit.

Other foreign firms recently involved in tax disputes in India include IBM, Royal Dutch Shell, Vodafone Plc and LG Electronics Inc.

"It's a very fair and balanced order," said N.P. Sahni, a lawyer for the tax department. "It substantially protects the interest of the revenue (department) and also enables Nokia to go ahead with its proposed deal with Microsoft."

A spokesman for Nokia in Helsinki said the company would comment after analysing the ruling.

In March, Nokia was served with a tax demand for about 20.8 billion rupees covering five fiscal years starting from 2006-07, according to a notice on the Delhi High Court website.

Including the anticipated liability, or the tax bill for the years that have not been assessed by the authorities, the total liability could be roughly 75 billion rupees, Mohan Parasaran, a lawyer representing the tax department, said on Wednesday.

If Nokia loses the legal battle, its liability could total 210 billion rupees, which includes penalties and interest, Parasaran said. He declined to give additional details.

Nokia, which wanted the asset freeze to be lifted by Dec. 12 to enable it to transfer the plant to Microsoft, has said it had not been served with any claim beyond the original 20.8 billion rupees notice.

Microsoft lucky to avoid Nokia's India tax bill

Microsoft is lucky to dodge Nokia's tax bill in India. On Dec. 12, the Delhi High Court allowed the Finnish group to transfer its Chennai factory to the U.S. software giant as part of its planned $7.4 billion sale of its mobile handset business. While the overall deal wasn't in doubt, Microsoft avoids Nokia's hard-to-assess tax liability. If only Vodafone had been so fortunate.

Indian authorities had seized Nokia's local assets after slapping it with a $340 million demand for unpaid taxes dating back to 2007. If the company loses the legal battle, the exchequer's final claim could be as much as ten times that amount, the tax office's lawyer has told Reuters.

That may be bluster, but Microsoft didn't want to find out. The dispute has been out in the open since March, giving lawyers for the Seattle company plenty of time to ensure that any liability stays with Nokia.

The Vodafone debacle explains why. Six years after the British mobile operator acquired its Indian business, it's still fighting a $2 billion claim for tax the authorities say it should have withheld from the price paid to Hutchison Whampoa. When India's highest court threw out the government's claim, New Delhi changed the tax law with retrospective effect, spooking investors.

The tax regime in India has become very wobbly. Nokia says it's been wrongly accused of evading taxes on payments made to its parent for supply of operating software. But the company is not alone. An Indian court recently told Verizon's unit in Singapore that the fees it receives from corporate clients in India for providing them with dedicated Internet access is taxable as a royalty - and hence subject to the same 10 percent withholding tax that Nokia is being asked to pony up.

Making sure multinationals pay more taxes to their host countries is a sore point, even in rich nations. India's bossy approach, though, could backfire. Too many countries are desperate for investment dollars. If New Delhi gets too heavy, the net effect will only be to increase India's dependence on Microsoft founder Bill Gates' charity.

Context News

- The Delhi High Court on Dec. 12 cleared the way for Nokia's India unit to sell its handset factory in Chennai to Microsoft.

- In a Sept. 26 interim order, the court had barred Nokia India from transferring ownership of its assets, which have been seized by the Indian income tax authority. The authority is asking Nokia India to settle unpaid withholding taxes on what it claims were royalty payments to its parent in Finland.

- The court asked the Finnish company to deposit 22.5 billion rupees ($367 million) in an escrow account, while the tax demand case will continue separately.

- Nokia had been trying to end the dispute ahead of the sale of its mobile phone business to Microsoft in a 5.4 billion euro ($7.4 billion) deal.

- Including the tax bill for the years that have not been assessed by the Indian authorities, the total liability could rise to roughly 75 billion rupees, Reuters reported on Dec. 11, citing the tax department's lawyer. If Nokia loses the legal battle, it may have to pay as much as 210 billion rupees ($3.44 billion), including penalties and interest, the lawyer said.

- In a statement issued before the court's final order, Nokia said it "has not received any official information on the potential tax claims, and thus far has only seen wildly varying claims from anonymous officials via the media. We do not see any merit in any of the claims."

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com