GOLF COURSE ROAD: There is something about actor, director and veteran theatre exponent Aamir Raza Husain that reminds you of James Goldman’s The Lion in Winter. In the ornate coffee shop of one of the city’s oldest hotels, a beam of sunlight finds the Padma Shree awardee as he says, “I don’t always like the spotlight. And I have a bad back, bad knees and a bad temper. Not necessarily in that order.”
But the man whose Stagedoor Productions has, since 1975, performed and presented around 150 theatre extravaganzas and over 5,000 shows, has earned his impatience with populist trends, lazy actors and bad diction.
Be it a large outdoor production like The Fifty Day War (2000), based on the Kargil War or The Legend of Ram (2004), Aamir never takes the easy way out of exhaustive research and impeccable production values. As a child from an aristocratic Awadhi family, he grew up amid refined arts, poetry and painstaking detailing of every word spoken. Hurried mediocrity in language and the creative realms bothers him.
He and his wife Virat Husain are in town to stage The Lion in Winter at ITC Windsor on Friday. Says Virat, “This is a historic play (set in King Henry II’s residence in Chinon, Anjou, within the Angevin Empire of medieval France) and both Aamir and I have a fascination for the texture, colour and vibrance that a period play lends itself to. But most importantly, The Lion in Winter is a story about human relationships. At the heart of everything is a universal thread of continuity and people must take back a feeling, a smile, a catch in the throat.”
Aamir holds forth on what it is about theatre that keeps Virat and him fascinated and some other subjects close to his heart:
The struggle to keep theatre thriving It is a struggle to get both money and good actors to keep a demanding production going. The fact is that there is a dearth of money and the arts are hit first because the returns here cannot be counted in cold cash. You need committed sponsors who are not just counting bums on the seats or eyeballs for each rupee spent. The number of people reached by a 15-second advertisement on TV is obviously far more than the 400-odd people a theatre production gets on a good day.
So those who are looking for only a large target audience will sponsor a musical night or a saas-bahu serial. And why is it hard to get good actors? Because there are few actors who have the requisite time and commitment to theatre. They would rather do voice-overs and earn a quick buck. Few want to be kicked around and accept the beating and the baptism by fire that theatre imposes.
Degeneration of languages: Few young actors today have the patience to speak languages well. They have lazy speech patterns. They won’t even say the word ‘what’ (rounding the ‘w’ properly) the right way. There was a time I would groom hundreds of kids in language skills and teach them how to act but now, I don’t have the patience. I am too old. Refinement in culture and in languages is not dying but it is shrinking.
We are a brash society now with no time for fine things. When you are a nation in a hurry, you miss out on the very things that once defined your music, your poetry and arts. Elegant prose and poetry in cinema are gone and even the best of actors would not know how to say anything that is lyrical. Once cinema taught humanism and artistic integrity. Today it teaches crass lyrics.
Cinema in the 50s and 60s and even the 70s was made by people who, regardless of their economic standing, came from rich cultural backgrounds, with a sense of heritage and history (post the Partition). If you were to recall 10 great songs this year, you will falter but if I ask you to recall 10 great songs from the 60s, you will recall 50. That shows that class and quality survive where populism falls by the wayside.
Dissent and suppression: It shocked me that the stamps featuring Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi have been scrapped. And what is happening to our educational institutions like FTII establishes only that we lack a leadership with a cultural background.
It is because of Nehru that we even have an FTII, and some of the leading educational and cultural institutions today.
Every new political regime redefines how institutions work and it is fine. But why plant an illiterate person in FTII? Why not appoint people with substance and intellect? As far as dissent goes, everyone has a right to disagree as long as it is not harming someone else and fanning communal hatred.