'Shut incompetent colleges, make law courses practical'

With institutions mushrooming around the country, quality of law education has been hit.

Published: 05th March 2017 03:28 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th March 2017 03:28 AM   |  A+A-

Advocates N Venkatraman and Aravind P Datar flanking Jayna Kothar (executive director of Centre of Law and Policy Research) during ThinkEdu Conclave | Sunish P Surendran

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: A few decades ago, law was a career option only if one failed to get into medicine or engineering. However, today, to get into a good law university, students have to participate in competitive exams, which is a welcome change, said prominent lawyers Arvind P Datar, senior advocate at the Madras High Court, and N Venkatraman, senior advocate at the Supreme Court, while participating in a discussion at the ThinkEdu Conclave on whether India was producing world-class lawyers.

“We do have world-class lawyers but we don’t have enough of them,” Datar said. He suggested three ways to improve the standard of law schools. “There was a time when there would only be a handful of law colleges and universities in the country. Today almost every State wants a national school, but we should remember that with quantity, quality always suffers. We need to stop allowing colleges from mushrooming,” said Datar. His second recommendation was to shut down incompetent colleges in the country.

The third suggestion Datar made was for law colleges to have part-time lecturers, who also practise law at the same time and are not full-time academicians. “In Mumbai, the law school was right next to the court and the classes would start at 7 and end at 10, after which the lawyers would go to practice. We need to have that kind of system in our law universities again. Students need to learn about the real experiences,” he explained.

Venkatraman agreed with his colleague, also adding that it was essential for law students to start spending more time in courts.  “Three-four week internships don’t really benefit, students should undergo at least a 90-day internship, so they know what awaits them,” he observed.

"Law courses like medicine have to be 50 per cent academics and 50 per cent experience. Also, we should not burden these students by forcing them to study 35 subjects, we have to allow them the freedom to choose what they want to study,” Venkatraman said. He added that law schools should begin to have the open-book system because eventually what mattered was the enhancement of skill and not academic grades.

Both the advocates and members of the audience also threw light on the advantages of live streaming or video-graphing court proceedings, not just for the benefit of law students but also public.

However, does producing world class lawyers only stop at imparting knowledge of theories or teaching students about the skill to win a case, questioned Jayna Kothari, executive director of Centre for Law and Policy Research. Ultimately there were four options for a law graduate – corporate employment, litigation, study and research and finally, social activism.

Speaking on this aspect, Kothari said, “Most students choose to go into corporate law because it is more lucrative and that is okay but are our law schools teaching students about social justice, do they know that most of the poor cannot access courts, that they cannot afford lawyers? Why do we have so few lawyers going into legal aid? Are our law schools addressing these social issues?”

She suggested that law schools should invest more time in our budding lawyers to make them aware of these problems and encouraging them to volunteer and help deliver justice in such situations.

Stay up to date on all the latest Chennai news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp