Corrupt Judge Charge: Katju Poses Six Questions to Lahoti

Former SC judge Markandey Katju, who alleged that three Chief Justices of India made \"improper compromises\" during UPA rule in allowing a judge under corruption cloud to continue in office, today posed six questions to one them--Justice R C Lahoti--on the issue.

Published: 22nd July 2014 11:46 AM  |   Last Updated: 22nd July 2014 12:58 PM   |  A+A-

Katju2PTI
By PTI

NEW DELHI: Former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju, who alleged that three Chief Justices of India made "improper compromises" during UPA rule in allowing a judge under corruption cloud to continue in office, today posed six questions to one them--Justice R C Lahoti--on the issue.
 

Watch Video: Markandey Katju Says TN Ally Forced UPA to Save Corrupt Judge

Katju asked if after receiving the adverse IB report against the Additional Judge, Lahoti, who was then Chief Justice of India, called a meeting of the three-Judge Supreme Court Collegium, consisting of himself, Justice Y K Sabharwal and Justice Ruma Pal, and the Collegium, having perused the IB report recommended to the Government of India not to extend the 2-year-term of that Additional Judge?

Katju, Chairman of the Press Council of India, put the posers to Lahoti on his blog.

On timing of his statement yesterday, he said, "Some people have commented about the timing of my statement. What happened was that some Tamilians had commented on Facebook that I am posting several matters on my Facebook post, so I should also post some of my experiences in Madras High Court.

"Then I started posting about my experiences there, and it was at time I remembered this experience too, and posted it," he said.

Katju asked, "Is it, or is it not, correct that after that recommendation of the 3 Judge Collegium of the Supreme Court was sent to the Government of India, he (Justice Lahoti), on his own, without consulting his 2 other Supreme Court Collegium colleagues, wrote a letter to the Government of India asking the Government to give another 1 year term as Additional Judge to the concerned Judge?"

The allegation on how an unnamed additional judge of Madras High Court was given extension at the instance of UPA-I government owing to pressure from an ally, a "Tamil Nadu party", apparently DMK, and then confirmed as a permanent judge led to an uproar yesterday in Parliament by AIADMK MPs even as questions were raised by parties like Congress on its timing.

Katju further said on his blog, "If indeed the IB reported, after an enquiry, that the Judge was indulging in corruption, why did he (Justice Lahoti) recommend to the Government of India to give that corrupt Judge another term of 1 year as Additional Judge in the High Court?"

Katju, who became the Chief Justice of Madras High Court in November 2004, had told TV channels yesterday, "These three former CJIs made improper compromises. Justice Lahoti who started it, then Justice Sabharwal and then Justice Balakrishnan. These are CJIs who can surrender. Is a CJI going to surrender to political pressure or not going to surrender to political pressure?"

Balakrishnan rejected the allegations as "completely baseless and not factually correct".

Katju, who was a Supreme Court judge from 2006 to 2011, was appointed as the PCI Chairman on October 5, 2011 and is due to retire on October 4, this year.

He started his blog posting today by saying Lahoti, when contacted by some media people about his statement which was published on my blog and in a daily yesterday, generally remarked that he has never done anything wrong in his life.

Katju said he (Lahoti) has not gone into any specifics, "so let me put him some specific questions:

"Is it, or is it not, correct that I first wrote him a letter from Chennai, stating that there were serious allegations of corruption about an Additional Judge of Madras High Court, and therefore he (Justice Lahoti) should get a secret intelligence enquiry held against that Additional Judge, and thereafter I personally met Justice Lahoti at Delhi and again requested for a secret IB enquiry against the Additional Judge about whom I had received several complaints, and from several sources, that he was indulging in corruption?

"Is it, or is it not, correct that on my request Justice Lahoti ordered a secret IB enquiry against that Judge?

"Is it, or is it not correct, that a few weeks after I personally met him in Delhi and then returned to Chennai, he telephoned me from Delhi (while I was at Chennai) and told me that the IB, after thorough enquiry, gave a report that indeed the Judge was indulging in corruption?"

Also Read

DMK Slams Katju For Baseless Allegations 

Didn't Cave in to Any Pressure: Ex-CJs

Katju: 3 Former CJIs Made "Improper Compromises" 

DMK Squirms as Katju Claim Rocks Houses

Katju's Allegations Completely Baseless: Balakrishnan

Demand for Probe into Katju's Charges, Timing Questioned

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp