Didn't Cave in to Any Pressure: Ex-CJs

Published: 22nd July 2014 08:15 AM  |   Last Updated: 22nd July 2014 08:15 AM   |  A+A-

Balakrishnan

NEW DELHI: The startling revelations made by former Chief Justice of India and present Press Council of India’s Chairman Markandey Katju that the UPA-I government had under pressure from a Tamil Nadu ally influenced the appointment of a “corrupt’’ Madras High Court (additional) judge, snowballed into a major issue on Monday.

But the three former CJIs, R C Lahotia, K G Balakrishnan and Y K Sabarwal, who too were named in his blog-expose denied involvement.

A day after Katju kicked up the controversy, (retd) Justice Lahoti and Balakrishnan, categorically denied, they had caved in to political pressure. While Lahoti, who Katju alleged had extended the “corrupt Madras HC judge’s’’ tenure by another year despite an adverse IB report, said, “Everything is on record, I’ve not done anything wrong in my life.’’

As for Balakrishnan, who’s now the NHRC chairperson, expressed surprise over the timing of Katju’s allegations, said, “Why is he saying all this after 10 years? Why are we talking about a person who is no more and cannot defend himself’’.

This in a way revealed the identity of the judge, Justice Ashok, had granted former Tamil Nadu CM M Kanrunanidhi bail following his midnight arrest in 2002. Denying he succumbed to “political pressure’’, Balakrishnan said: “I thought it is fit to transfer him to Andhra Pradesh as, the party was not ruling in Andhra then.”

Meanwhile, then Law Minister H R Bharadwaj said that a delegation of 18 SC/ST MPs from TN had met prime minister Singh alleged that Katju had a bias against the Madras HC judge whom he was targeting Bharadwaj, in fact, asserted no influence was brought over the appointment, but “injustice was caused by Justice Katju unnecessarily’’. Then CJI had to “clear his appointment as additional judge’’, Bharadwaj added, in a way confirming the episode.

Just Balakrishnan’s explanation of the procedure adopted to clear Justice Ashok’s appointment revealed that there was an “adverse report against the judge’’, but interpretations of the report was different.

Coming in the context of Gopal Subramanium’s name getting expunged from the collegium recommendations to the current Government, Katju’s allegations are significant.

More so as the government is slated to bring a Judicial Appointment Commission Bill that would replace the present system of judicial appointment.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp