Supreme Court judge recuses from hearing Narayan Sai's bail plea in bribery case

Self-styled godman Asaram's son Narayan Sai is accused of offering a bribe to officials to weaken a rape case filed against him by a Surat-based woman.

Published: 02nd February 2017 06:21 PM  |   Last Updated: 02nd February 2017 06:21 PM   |  A+A-

Self-styled godman Asaram's son Narayan Sai | PTI File Photo

NEW DELHI: A Supreme Court judge today recused himself from hearing the bail plea of self-styled godman Asaram's son Narayan Sai in a case in which he is accused of offering a bribe to officials to weaken a rape case filed against him by a Surat-based woman.

As soon as Sai's counsel got up to start advancing arguments, Justice U U Lalit, who was sitting with senior judge Justice M B Lokur on the bench, wished to recuse himself from the hearing.

The court then referred the matter to Chief Justice J S Khehar for it to be listed before another bench.

Earlier, the Gujarat High Court had rejected the bail application of Narayan Sai, 44, who is at present lodged in Surat jail.

It has been alleged that when Sai was being interrogated in connection with a rape case, the city crime branch unearthed a plan to bribe policemen, doctors and even judicial officers to dilute the sexual assault case.

Sai was arrested for repeatedly sexually assaulting one of the two Surat-based sisters, who was the inmate of his ashram here between 2002 and 2005.

In February 2014, the Surat police had filed a charge-sheet in a special court against Sai and eight others under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act in connection with the bribery case.

The police had named nine persons, including Sai, as accused in the charge sheet.

Sai's follower Uday Sanghani and builder from Surat, Ketan Patel, were also made accused in the charge sheet.

The sisters had lodged two different complaints against Sai and another against his father accusing them of rape, sexual assault, illegal confinement and other charges.

The police had booked Sai under the various IPC sections including rape, unnatural sex, molestation, wrongful confinement, unlawful assembly, rioting armed with deadly weapon, criminal intimidation and criminal conspiracy.

In her complaint, the younger of the two had accused Sai of repeated sexual assault between 2002 and 2005 when she was living at the Surat ashram.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp