Countering Mehbooba Mufti, BJP says Article 35-A has done more harm to Jammu and Kashmir

JK BJP’s chief spokesman said statement of Mehbooba on Article 35-A doesn't depict true picture and is politically incorrect.

Published: 29th July 2017 07:04 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th July 2017 08:28 AM   |  A+A-

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti (File | PTI)

Express News Service

SRINAGAR: A day after Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti warned against tinkering with Article 35-A, which grants special status to the State, her ruling ally BJP on Saturday countered her saying the Article has done more harm to the State than any other provision of the law.

State BJP’s chief spokesman, Sunil Sethi, said statement of Mehbooba on Article 35-A doesn't depict true picture and is politically incorrect.

He said Article 35-A is introduced in Constitution of India through process of Article 370 and has lead to “only disparity and inequalities in the state”.

“As Article 35-A saves state subject laws from applicability’s of concept of equality, it has lead to situation on unequal treatment of female state subjects and their children within state,” Sethi said. 

While addressing a two-day conference, “Understanding Kashmir: A Composite Dialogue on Peace, Stability and the Way Forward” in New Delhi yesterday, Mehbooba had said, “If Article 35-A was tinkered with, no one, neither the opposition National Conference nor our party (PDP), who hold the national flag in Kashmir despite risks, and despite attacks on our workers, will be left to hold that”.

Article 35-A confers special rights and privileges on permanent residents of the State and debars non-residents from buying land or property, getting a government job or voting in State Assembly elections.

Sethi said though BJP stands by Agenda of Alliance (AoA) framed by PDP and the party for running a coalition government in the state and won't seek alteration of existing constitutional position but it is equally true that Article 35-A has created more harm to state than any other provision of law . 

“The state subject laws, which are protected by Article 35-A , are also responsible for slow growth and progress of state, which has become fiscally dependent on grants of Central government in absence of less investments and infrastructural projects. Outsiders are reluctant in investing their money in J&K and despite having abundant natural resources, State is in a financial mess because of self-isolation,” he said. 

Terming Mehbooba’s statement as “not happily worded”, BJP spokesman said, “Bearing national flag in the state is an honour for all citizens and our party firmly believes that every person of J&K is first Indian and then state subject. The nationalism of people of state can't be understated by linking it with continuation of Article 35-A.”

“Though BJP stands politically for maintaining present constitutional position but complete justice will happen to the people of the state when all laws propagating inequality would go,” added Sethi.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp