Five-judge Bench to review job promotion quota for Scheduled Castes and Tribes

A five-judge Constitution Bench will decide whether an 11-year-old Supreme Court judgment on reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in job promotions needed to be revisited.

Published: 15th November 2017 10:24 PM  |   Last Updated: 16th November 2017 07:48 AM   |  A+A-

The Supreme Court of India

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: A five-judge Constitution Bench will decide whether an 11-year-old Supreme Court judgment on reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in job promotions needed to be revisited.

On Wednesday, a three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra referred the matter to the Constitution Bench to decide on whether the 2006 judgment in the M Nagaraj v. Union of India should be reconsidered. However, the CJI on Wednesday made clear that the Constitution Bench will not go into the merits of the 2006 judgment.

In the Nagraj case, a five-judge Constitution Bench had ruled that creamy layer should be excluded from the reservations for the SCs and STs in government jobs. The apex court had also held that the State was not bound to make reservations for SC/ST in matter of promotions. However, if it wished to exercise its discretion and make such a provision, then it should collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class and inadequacy of representation of that class in public employment in addition to compliance of Article 335.

It was also held that even if the State had compelling reasons, it would have to see that the quota did not breach the 50 per cent ceiling limit, or obliterate the creamy layer, or extend the reservation indefinitely.

A Bench of Justices Kurian Joseph and R Banumathi had on Tuesday referred the matter to the CJI-led Bench saying that clarity was required on the application of creamy layer in situations of completing claims within the same races, communities, groups or parts thereof of SC/ST communities notified by the President under Articles 341 and 342. The court was hearing a batch of petitions which arose from a Bombay High Court order quashing two state government resolutions terming them as ultra vires to Article 16(4A) of the Constitution. Several other states have also approached the apex court on the issue.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp