Senior Supreme Court judge Justice Chelameswar, who raised voice for KM Joseph's apex court elevation, retires today

At the last collegium meeting, on May 16, a final decision could not be reached on the other judges whose names need to be sent along with that of Justice Joseph for elevation.

Published: 22nd June 2018 02:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 22nd June 2018 05:20 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court judge Justice Jasti Chelameswar (File | AP)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Justice J Chelameswar, who first raised his voice for the elevation of KM Joseph, Chief Justice of Uttarakhand High Court, as a judge in the Supreme Court, will not see it happen before he retires on Friday.

At the last collegium meeting, on May 16, a final decision could not be reached on the other judges whose names need to be sent along with that of Justice Joseph for elevation. The matter will now be taken up by a new collegium that will include Justice AK Sikri, the sixth most senior judge in the apex court.

Justice Sikri has so far stayed away from any kind of controversy and is known to enjoy the trust of Chief Justice Dipak Misra.

It will, however, be extremely difficult and also extraordinary for the new collegium to decide against sending back Justice KM Joseph’s name, since there is already a resolution by the present collegium unanimously deciding in favour of reiteration of his name.

Justice Chelameswar was a part of the January 12 press conference where the four most senior judges—including Justices Ranjan Gogoi, Kurian Joseph and Madan B Lokur— criticised the conduct of CJI Dipak Misra and the way the Supreme Court was being administered.

In February 2017, Justice Chelameswar had written a strongly worded dissent note on Justice Joseph not being elevated.

Justice Chelameswar again threw his weight behind Justice Joseph at a collegium meeting in January 2018, and it was unanimously decided that his name should be sent to the government for elevation as a judge in the top court. He wrote to the CJI in February this year regretting how appointments were being stalled by the government.

Later that month, the Centre declined to process Justice Joseph’s name for appointment in the Supreme Court and raised issues of his seniority and regional representation in the Supreme Court.
In May, Justice Chelameswar wrote to the CJI once again, requesting him to convene a meeting of the collegium to urgently reiterate to the Centre the name of Justice Joseph for elevation as a judge of the apex court.

Chelameswar became Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court in May 2007, but was not elsevated to the Supreme Court until October 2011, thus robbing him of the chance to become Chief Justice of India, as it placed him behind CJI Dipak Misra in seniority in the apex court.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Raghu Chennai

    Justice Chelmeswar as once was denied the elevation to SC while he was CJ of Cauwhati in the year 2007 is being repeated in Justice KM Joseph case also in 2018 because of the beauracracy of the present Government which the Lawminister is compelled to compromise to save his ministerial post Is it not shameful to the Law Minister!!!?? The people would pass the judgment inthe ensuing 2029 Lokhsaba Election
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp