We tried to set things right: Retired Supreme Court judge Chelameswar on January 12 press conference

Chelameswar, who retired on Friday, said that he strongly believed that the unprecedented judges’ Press conference in a way, was their contribution towards strengthening the judicial system.

Published: 23rd June 2018 01:52 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd June 2018 06:00 AM   |  A+A-

Justice J Chelameswar and three other sitting Supreme Court judges addressing a press conference. (PTI file photo)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: After serving as a judge for 21 years, Supreme Court judge Justice J Chelameswar retired on Friday, saying that he strongly believed that the unprecedented judges’ Press conference and the questions they raised about the institution were, in a way, their contribution towards strengthening the judicial system.

“We made our attempts to set the things right according to our perception of what is wrong and what is right in that context. Since we concluded that we were not able to set the things right, we decided to inform the nation,” Justice Chelameswar said on why the four most senior judges decided to hold a Press conference, adding that politically sensitive cases were being allocated to selected benches, implying that there were external forces influencing the judiciary.

Amidst speculation over whether Justice Ranjan Gogoi, who is next in line for being appointed as Chief Justice of India, would be superseded on account of his participation in the Press conference, Chelameswar said he did not expect that kind of a situation.

Earlier this week, the Union minister of law and justice made it clear that the government would not interfere in the matter and the recommendation on the next Chief Justice would come from the present one as per the convention.

On the eve of his retirement, Justice Chelameswar had said that he never had personal problems with the three CJIs he worked within the apex court—Justices T S Thakur, J S Khehar and Dipak Misra.

It was during Justice Thakur’s tenure as CJI that Justice Chelameswar had declined to attend collegium meetings, citing their opaqueness and lack of objective process.

Justice Chelameswar’s was the lone dissenting voice in 2015 that ruled in favour of the National Judicial Appointments Commission and disapproved of the functioning of the collegium.

His dissent finally worked and, in October 2017, the collegium headed by CJI Misra passed a resolution to post on the Supreme Court’s website its recommendations on judicial appointments, transfers and elevations.

Justice Chelameswar also backed the collegium’s recommendation to elevate Uttarakhand Chief Justice KM Joseph to the Supreme Court and said, “Don’t know why it’s being held up. Justice Joseph deserves to be elevated.”

On his future plans, Justice Chelameswar said he planned to settle down in his ancestral village in Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Higgins Boson

    Dont bulls_hit people. The political undertones are obvious. Obfuscating and stretching the truth will never yield results. The facts that you entertained a politician in your chamber clearly violates the sanctity of the court and casts aspersions on your motives.
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp