CJI sexual harassment case: Unlikely to get justice, says woman, leaves SC in-house panel hearing

The woman said during the panel's hearing that the judges told her that it was neither an in-house committee proceeding nor a proceeding under the Vishakha Guidelines.

Published: 30th April 2019 08:29 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th April 2019 09:37 PM   |  A+A-

Justice Gogoi

CJI Ranjan Gogoi (File | PTI)

By IANS

NEW DELHI: The former employee of the Supreme Court, who has accused Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi of sexual harassment, said on Tuesday that she would no more appear before an in-house committee set up by the apex court to probe her charges as she felt that she is "not likely to get justice".

The woman, who appeared once before the committee, comprising Justices SA Bobde, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, said she felt "quite intimidated and nervous" in the presence of the three judges of the Supreme Court.

In a statement to the media, she expressed serious reservations over the panel, saying it was "an in-house committee of sitting judges junior to the CJI and not an external committee as I had requested..."

The woman said during the panel's hearing on April 26, the judges told her that it was neither an in-house committee proceeding nor a proceeding under the Vishakha Guidelines and that it was an informal proceeding.

"I was asked to narrate my account which I did to the best of my ability even though I felt quite intimidated and nervous in the presence of three Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court and without having a lawyer or support person with me," said the woman.

"I felt I was not likely to get justice from this committee and so I am no longer participating in the 3 Judge Committee proceedings," she said in the statement.

ALSO READ: 'Rich and powerful cannot run judiciary': Supreme Court on conspiracy claims against CJI Ranjan Gogoi

The woman had told the committee that she had lost hearing in one ear completely due to "stress" and as a consequence, she was "unable to hear, sometimes, the instructions that were being dictated by Justice Bobde to the court official as a record of my statements before the committee."

She added that "the committee declined my request for video recording" of the committee proceedings. "I was also clearly told that no lawyer/support person could be present with me during the committee hearing."

ALSO READ | Woman who accused CJI of sexual harassment objects to inclusion of Justice Ramana in judges’ panel

She claimed that the committee instructed her orally not to disclose the proceedings of the committee to the media and "not share the proceedings with her lawyer Vrinda Grover."

The committee was formed after the woman levelled allegations against the Chief Justice reportedly in a letter to 22 judges of the Supreme Court.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments(2)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • ak.dev

    It's becoming clearer now that the purpose of woman seems not to get justice but defame CJI. The whole country is wishing this conspiracy to be busted and the culprits punished.
    1 month ago reply
  • Pal Singh

    What's this happening ?
    1 month ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp