Child from second marriage eligible for job on compassionate ground: Chhatisgarh HC

The petitioner though maintained that the second marriage is not permissible, which is invariably clarified in the terms and conditions advised in the offer of initial appointment.

Published: 04th July 2019 06:13 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th July 2019 06:16 PM   |  A+A-

court, order, hammer, high court

Image used for representational purpose only

Express News Service

RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh High Court in a significant judgment declared the child born out of a second marriage will be considered as legitimate and consequently also eligible for grant of appointment on compassionate ground 

A division bench comprising of Chief Justice P R Ramchandra Menon and Justice Sanjay K Agrawal dismissed the writ petition of the Railways that asserted that the respondent is a daughter from the second wife of the deceased railway staff and so she cannot be considered for the privilege of compassionate appointment since the administration had not permitted the father for the second marriage (in accordance to the official circular). 

However, the respondent counsel P Shridhar argued that the daughter from the second wife of the employee is still a legitimate child and has every right to seek compassionate appointment and sought the writ petition filed by the railways be dismissed. 

The petitioner though maintained that the second marriage is not permissible, which is invariably clarified in the terms and conditions advised in the offer of initial appointment. So, the cases for compassionate appointment to the second widow or her wards cannot be forwarded to the Railway Board. 

However, the court observed that the child born out of second marriage is still a legitimate child and is entitled to the compassionate appointment, even though the marriage may be referred to as null and void. 

Citing Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 a child born from a marriage entered into while the earlier marriage is subsisting to be legitimate, it would not be open to the State, consistent with Article 14 to exclude such a child from seeking the benefit of compassionate appointment. Such a condition of exclusion is arbitrary and ultra vires, the court maintained. 

The court granted a duration of 45 days from the day order to the petitioner for considering the case of the respondent for grant of compassionate appointment. 

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp