Patel deserves the statue,  and much more

When the British left the country, they gave all the princely states three options—to declare their independence, accede to India or accede to Pakistan.

Published: 06th November 2018 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 06th November 2018 08:32 AM   |  A+A-

Statue of Unity illustration

Statue of Unity. Illustration by Amit bandre

The inauguration of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel’s statue—the Statue of Unity—in Gujarat on October 31 by the prime minister has raised the hackles of the whining, carping bunch of malcontents of the Nehruvian and Marxist mould who question the wisdom of erecting a statue—incidentally the tallest in the world—at a huge cost. But these complaints must be brushed aside because we owe our very existence as a nation to Sardar Patel. There are a lot more reasons as well—many of which were hidden by sarkari historians owing allegiance to a single political family. Here are some of them.

When the British left the country, they gave all the princely states three options—to declare their independence, accede to India or accede to Pakistan. To get such a motley group of over 550 maharajas and rajas—many of whom were on their own ego trips—to sign on the dotted line and become part of India was a Herculean task. However, Patel’s steely determination, combined with his diplomacy and foresight, enabled him to get the princes to sign the Instrument of Accession.

The Nizam of Hyderabad and the Nawab of Junagadh had wanted to remain independent or to accede to Pakistan and a couple of maharajas in central India were keen to retain their independence. Patel put his foot down, sent in the armed forces when necessary and got these states integrated into India. “I do not want undigested lumps in India’s belly”, he is reported to have said in the context of Hyderabad becoming part of Pakistan.

The then PM Jawaharlal Nehru was not happy with the use of force, but the truth is that if ‘Iron Man’ Patel were not around at that time, no one would have been able to counter Nehru’s pusillanimity and the map of India would have been in tatters on the very day of her Independence.  

Is this not sufficient reason for building the Statue of Unity?
Apart from being tough as nails while dealing with issues relating to national unity, Patel had another extraordinary quality—his readiness to sacrifice for the larger cause. There is abundant evidence to show that he was the very epitome of selflessness, in contrast to the pettiness and selfishness of Nehru. On Gandhi’s advice, Patel had to forego the opportunity to head the Congress on many occasions including 1929, 1936 and 1946 and make way for Nehru.

In 1946, it was clear that the person elected head of the Congress would be invited by the British to be the first prime minister of independent India. The party asked 15 Pradesh Congress Committees to propose names for the office; 12 of the 15 committees voted for Sardar Patel. The remaining three committees had no opinion. The story goes that Nehru went into a sulk and told Gandhi that he would not play second fiddle to anybody! Gandhi stepped in once again on behalf of Nehru and got Patel to withdraw from the contest.

Thus, although his party overwhelmingly wanted him to be the first PM after Independence, Patel sacrificed this for the sake of the party and national unity. Historians loyal to the Nehru-Gandhis have tried to hide these facts from the people all these years. So, for those who ask why spend so much on Patel’s statue, the answer is: “Is this not sufficient reason to remember the Sardar in the most memorable way possible?”

As against Patel’s large-heartedness, we now have evidence of how small-minded and spiteful Nehru was when dealing with Patel. When Patel died on 15 December 1950 in Mumbai, he directed officials from Delhi not to attend Patel’s funeral in Mumbai. Even more shocking was the first order he issued after the Sardar’s demise—that Patel’s official car be returned to the foreign ministry forthwith. More was to follow. The best example of Nehru’s small-mindedness relates to the Bharat Ratna. Nehru’s government gave the Bharat Ratna to Nehru in 1955! Sardar Patel was conferred the Bharat Ratna by the Chandra Shekhar government in 1991.

Further, while the Nehru-Gandhis have helped themselves to much of Lutyens’ geography, Nehru treated Patel’s daughter Maniben in the most insensitive manner when she met him after Patel’s death. In his memoirs, Verghese Kurien, the father of the milk revolution, tells us how shabbily Nehru treated her. After Patel died, Maniben picked up a book and a bag that belonged to him and went to meet Nehru. Patel had instructed her to hand them over to Nehru.

The bag contained `35 lakh that belonged to the Congress and the book was the party’s book of accounts. Nehru took them and thanked her. “Maniben waited expectantly, hoping he would say something more, but he did not, so she got up and left.” He did not even enquire as to how she was doing after the passing of Patel. Kurien found Nehru’s behaviour “distressing”.

Many years ago, this writer had put together a list of 450 government schemes, projects and institutions named after just three members of the Nehru-Gandhi family. This included a majority of social welfare schemes of the Union government, airports, national parks, educational and scientific institutions, and sports tournaments. Nothing was left out. Yet, all those party to this vulgar display of sycophancy are unhappy that the man who gave us the India we live in today is being honoured in a manner which is worthy of his stupendous effort.   

Therefore, the time has come for India to make adequate reparation for the pettiness displayed by Nehru and his progeny towards Sardar Patel, the greatest son of India. The Statue of Unity is now a reality because of the Patel-like determination and commitment of PM Narendra Modi to give the Sardar his due. Modi must ignore these critics and take further initiatives like introducing the real Sardar to school children through history books. He must then begin the next big project to provide another extraordinary national hero—Subhas Chandra Bose—his rightful place. Bose too has been a victim of the chicanery of ‘establishment historians’. The nation will always remember Modi for ensuring that India will eternally be grateful to its real heroes.

Stay up to date on all the latest Opinions news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • sanjoysatpathy

    Excellent article.Very few could write like him.Thank you Dr.Suryaprakash
    1 month ago reply
  • Vinod M. Patel, CA, CPA

    Sarda Vallabhbhai Patel was a Great Son of Karamsad
    2 months ago reply
  • badri narayanan poondi

    Santwanaji had balanced the tilt in favour of Patel created by your article now and Shri Patel would now be lost in the noise against the govt investment on his statue! LOL!
    2 months ago reply
  • Apollo

    Patel wanted to give Kashmir to Pakistan as per RSS's Sheshadri.
    2 months ago reply
  • Anilkumar

    Wonderful write up
    2 months ago reply
  • Gopalan

    History is what historians say only. A country with large illiterate population
    2 months ago reply

    Nehru should be the person who should be forgotten and erased from Indian history. His contribution to the country is nothing compared to others. He characterised all the unwanted qulaities of a human being and his successors
    2 months ago reply

    Nehru was also totally against Patel idea for repair and complete renovation of the Somnath Temple.
    2 months ago reply
  • raghu

    Utter Stupidity to spend thousands of crores on a statue
    2 months ago reply
  • MangoManav

    Only now people are realizing how tall Patel was compared to Nehru
    2 months ago reply
  • charu

    Thank you SIR! Having advised Modi what to do next
    2 months ago reply
  • Prapur

    2 months ago reply
  • kkvadhera

    I wish the narrow minded Congressmen go through this article and ponder if their behavior on the inauguration of The Statue of Unity was fair..But how can they think fair when their leaders-Nehru Gandhi family- have always been unjust to true patriots like Bose n Patel. Wish Nehru had listened to Gen Carriappa n Patel and there would have been no Kashmir Issue.
    2 months ago reply
  • avatar

    Vallabh Bhai Patel was a true patriot and founding father of Bharat. The statue is minuscule to unity of Bharat. He was not Harddick Patel or today's backward class Patels. Some rise above it all. Dynasty duffers will be always that. Get rid of Judaeo Christian Islam from Bharat. Let Hindus govern Hindsthan.
    2 months ago reply
  • Anil

    Patel did not care about personal gain of any kind and he would not have cared if he had a statue or not. This is a fact as we witnessed him leaving the PM position on being asked to and having left politics thanks to Nehru and his personal greed. Nehru left behind a legacy of monarchy and family rule. The only people who seem to care are Congress who fear being lost in history. One statue and a park is a lot less than the Samadhi's and parks in the name of the Nehru-Gandhi family just in Delhi alone where that land could be put to better use.
    2 months ago reply
  • swa

    Nehru surrounded himself with communists like Krishna Menon and leftist marxist word spinners to bolster Nehruvian Anti-Hindu - India his concoctions.
    2 months ago reply
  • Dr. Satish Mullick

    2 months ago reply
  • Kevin

    This is such an honest opinion from an author. Wish other media people can be so honest.
    2 months ago reply
    • Ram

      Yes - an outrightly honest article for a change.
      2 months ago reply
  • Rishika

    Excellent Article!!! Thanks so much for sharing this.
    2 months ago reply
  • Rao Nanduri

    India would have been much stronger
    2 months ago reply
  • Srini

    Thank you .. should be an eye opener for many..
    2 months ago reply
  • K.S.Subramanian

    Is anyone listening to these in the Dynasty ? Oh no
    2 months ago reply
  • Mani Seshadri

    Patel does not deserve the statue. The man dwarfs the statue. No stattue can measure upto him. Having said that
    2 months ago reply
  • Mani Seshadri

    I will make only this comment. It was in the news that President Rajendra Prasad himself conferred Bharat Ratna on Nehru without nomination.
    2 months ago reply
  • Manicklal Chakraborty

    I tank you very much A Surya Prakash
    2 months ago reply
  • Nihar

    Well said. This is the truth and all Indians should salute the writer for bringing out the truth. Enough of lies to mask the truth.
    2 months ago reply
  • Ycsreddy

    'Sathyameva jayathe'.
    2 months ago reply
  • surender

    Excellent article on Patel's sacrifices
    2 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp