Article 370 abrogation: Right intentions, wrong steps

Let it be stated right away that there is nothing politically or morally wrong in restructuring J-K after the passage of seven decades, writes TJS George. But...

Published: 11th August 2019 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 11th August 2019 11:40 AM   |  A+A-

Security personnel stand guard during curfew like restriction on fifth consecutive day in Srinagar Friday August 9 2019. | PTI

When the makers of our Constitution used the term ‘India that is Bharat’, the implication was that the cultural strength of ancient Bharat would energise the modernistic thrust of resurgent India. It did for a while; India became a model for newly independent nations. Then new forces rose that damaged India’s position as the proud bearer of Bharat Varsha’s values. A hefty push in that direction has been given by the sensationalist style in which Jammu and Kashmir was broken up all of a sudden and reassembled to different specifications.

Let it be stated right away that there is nothing politically or morally wrong in restructuring J&K after the passage of seven decades. History moves according to circumstances. In 1949, the aftermath of independence and partition called for a set of special arrangements. This gave J&K a special status outside the Indian Constitution. Nevertheless, for all practical purpose J&K has been an integral part of India.

Farooq Abdullah, a distinguished chief minister of the state, became India’s energy minister from 2009-14. Omar Abdullah was minister of state for external affairs under Prime Minister Vajpayee. When leaders of a state become so integrated with the Union, that state cannot go on forever saying that it is different from other states. J&K’s position as an integral part of India is beyond question.

ALSO READ | Kashmir clampdown: Worst communication blockade since 1989

Mehbooba Mufti, a former chief minister, is protesting the loudest. She is one-sided in her arguments. “We went wrong in choosing India over Pakistan” she said. It was that ‘wrong’ that made her a chief minister. If she had gone ‘right’ and chosen Pakistan, she wouldn’t even have had an address. She went on record with the statement: “Our special status is not a gift bestowed upon us. It is a right guaranteed by Parliament.” Which Parliament? Which country? Her position was self-defeating even by the universal principle, The Lord giveth, the Lord taketh away.

A worthwhile point Mehbooba made was: “They want to change the demography of the only Muslim-majority state in India, disempower Muslims and make them second-class citizens in their own state.” When Kashmiri Pundits were driven out of that state, where were voices like these? When it suited them, Kashmiri leaders went along with injustices. Mehbooba even became an ally of the BJP in her search for power. To cry foul now is to cry in vain. 

But the question remains: What was the urgency to change the demography of J&K as if the country’s future depended on it? The Union Government obviously knew that they were making changes drastic enough to cause an uprising. Troops were moved to J&K well in advance, pilgrims and tourists were evacuated and general warnings issued, giving the impression that ground was being prepared for battle. Even the final policy announcement had the mark of a non-parliamentary autocracy. The Constitution was amended by an executive order, unheard of in the history of democracy.

ALSO READ | Article 370 abrogation: Fear factor dampens festive spirit in Kashmir

Official excuses ranged from America’s shift in Afghanistan policy to the cache of arms Russia had left in Afghanistan. These are too childish to merit attention. More credible is the argument of a political insider in Delhi that, after the BJP’s massive mandate of 303 seats in the Lok Sabha, “Parent body RSS wants some decisive action that would be a show of strength. Kashmir would suit the purpose more than issues like Ram Mandir.”

Exercises of brute power on a daily basis will now be the story of J&K. Putting local leaders under house arrest is the publishable kind of action because it is routine. Largely shielded from the outside world will be the harsher actions—incarceration, interrogation, terrorising, denial of human rights. 

In the end, there is no escaping the feeling that the biggest policy decision taken by the Modi II Government has been for Hindutva reasons. The overhauling of J&K essentially means putting the Muslims there on a tight leash. This is so basic an article of faith with the present leadership that it would be a waste of time to talk about the stealthy style adopted, the authoritarian way of decision-making, the depravity of it all. What the country faces is a fait accompli situation. A take it or leave it offer. A like it or lump it choice. This is the way the cookie crumbles. Cry, the beloved country.

Stay up to date on all the latest T J S George news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Bala

    I tink Mr george can join Hindu so that he can work with like minded Ram India is the only country where pseudo intellectuals abuse democracy. God bless Bharat
    9 days ago reply
  • Not fooled

    So the BJP/RSS did something they have stood for more than 60 years so that they can put Muslims on a tight leash?? Even while you agree with what the Govt has done you find find reasons (albeit constipated) to disagree with them such are your biases..You sorry excuse of a a pity people like you are allowed to air their views without any accountability.
    10 days ago reply
    • Raman

      Both Bala and 'Not fooled' have expressed what countless other readers of NIE feel about Sri George's writings. He is always abusive of anything Modi
      5 days ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp