Tribunal Says No to Relief for Discoms

Published: 23rd April 2015 06:03 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd April 2015 06:03 AM   |  A+A-

BHUBANESWAR:The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (ATE) on Tuesday quashed the interim application of Reliance Infrastructure controlled distribution companies seeking stay on operation of the March 4 order of Odisha Electricity Regulatory Commission (OERC).

“It is not possible for us to grant any mandatory interim relief to the appellants and restore status-quo ante. The interim application is therefore dismissed,” said the order of the Appellate Tribunal.

A two-member bench of the Tribunal comprising Chairperson Justice Ranjana P Desai and Technical member Rakesh Nath said, “It is well settled that the court or the Tribunal should not grant an interim relief which would amount to final relief and make the pending  suit infructuous. If we restore status quo ante, the appeal will become infructuous. We cannot do so,” they said.

Three distribution companies - Western Electricity Supply Company (WESCO), North-eastern Electricity Supply Company (NESCO) and Southern Electricity Supply Company (SOUTHCO) - challenged the March 4 order of OERC revoking their distribution licences.

Initiating suo motu action against the three discoms for violating terms and conditions of the distribution licence, OERC revoked their licence under Section 19 (revocation of licence based on public interest) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The OERC order said the utilities have miserably failed in key areas such as energy audit, inability to control technical and commercial loss, poor billing efficiency, non-payment of arrears with regard to Bulk Supply Price (BSP) and servicing NTPC Bond.

The State regulator vests the management and control of its three distribution utilities with the Chairman and Managing Director of Gridco.

Reliance Infrastructure has 51 per cent stake in the three discoms while the State-owned Gridco is the minority shareholder with 49 per cent stake.

“However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Nothing said by us in this order should be treated as our expression of final opinion on the merits of either the appellants’ case or the respondents’ case,” the ATE order said.

Making a strong plea before the ATE not to grant any interim relief, State Government counsel Dushyant Dave said public interest demands that the petitioners should not be protected.

The majority shareholders of the appellants (nominees of BSES/RIL) have no stake whatsoever in the discoms for having not invested any money since 1999. On the contrary, in the garb of controlling shareholding, they have abused public funds beyond redemption and imagination, Dave submitted.

Stay up to date on all the latest Odisha news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp