Kin Clash Over Control on Rich Dawoodi Bohra Community

According to Qutbuddin, his half-brother Najmuddin, 20 years older influenced Burhanuddin’s family to declare Saifuddin as the Syedna.

Published: 23rd August 2015 07:25 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd August 2015 08:15 AM   |  A+A-

Community

MUMBAI:The fight between an uncle and his nephew for the chair of Syedna, the supreme spiritual leader of the Dawoodi Bohra community, has taken an interesting turn after the first bout in the Bombay High Court is over. The second round will begin on August 24.

Community1.jpgKhuzaima Qutbuddin, 74, has challenged the appointment of his nephew Mufaddal Saifuddin, 70, as the 53rd Syedna. He claims that the 52nd Syedna—his elder brother, the late Muhammad Burhanuddin—had appointed him as his successor in 1965, almost 49 years before his death on January 17, 2014. Saifuddin, the second son of Burhanuddin, also claims that he is the natural heir to the chair.

In Bombay High Court’s room number 46, people listened curiously when Qutbuddin told the court that he was wearing a ring that originally belonged to the 51st Syedna Taher Saifuddin, his father. He claimed that late Syedna Burhanuddin had given him the ring after he pronounced nass (official anointment) on him. “The Syedna appointed me as Mazoon (second in hierarchy). He also pronounced nass on me. He gave me this ring, which I wear to this day,” Qutbuddin told the court when the current Syedna Saifuddin’s lawyer Iqbal Chhagla cross-examined him.

Community2.jpgQutbuddin pointed out that Burhanuddin was a Mazoon before his predecessor made him a Syedna. He, however, maintained that the nass was not made public because Burhanuddin feared there could be violent reactions to it. None of his other 11 brothers and eight sisters were aware of it either.

According to Qutbuddin, his half-brother Najmuddin, who was 20 years older to him, influenced Burhanuddin’s family to declare Saifuddin as the Syedna. Interestingly, Saifuddin is Najmuddin’s son-in-law. Qutbuddin also said that two attempts were made to kill him; first in Indore during Muharram and the second in Yemen. The car in which he was supposed to be travelling in was shot at.

Qutbuddin’s lawyer Ravi Kadam will cross-examine Saifuddin from Monday in the same courtroom where Muhammad Ali Jinnah had unsuccessfully argued against the six-year jail term to Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak in 1914. In a rare scenario, the entire proceeding is being videotaped.

The Syedna and Mazoon’s absolute authority over the rich Dawoodi Bohra community has brought the family to the court. The Dai (Syedna) and Mazoon together guide the community and have control over its mosques, trusts, hospitals and educational institutes. The trust runs a super speciality hospital in Mumbai and also oversees a redevelopment plan of Bhendi Bazaar, one of Mumbai’s most crowded areas. The project cost runs into crores of rupees.

In his 700-page suit, Qutbuddin has given details on why he is the right claimant to the chair. In contrast, Saifuddin has filed a 494-page affidavit elaborating on how he is the obvious choice for the position.

Qutbuddin’s supporters have launched a Facebook page to underpin his claim. They say that Saifuddin is a regressive person and does not like women stepping out of their homes. Saifuddin has ordered the community members to  remain indoors for 10 days during Muharram, as it is a period of mourning. The order has not gone well in the community, known for its liberal views.

Saifuddin’s cross-examination from Monday will also give answers whether he is regressive.

Stay up to date on all the latest The Sunday Standard news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp