Kerala's Attappadi tribals left cooling heels over ‘Record of Rights’

A year has passed since the tribals of Kerala’s Attappadi sent in applications for the Record of Rights for the land under their possession in the second phase.

Published: 31st December 2017 08:53 AM  |   Last Updated: 31st December 2017 08:53 AM   |  A+A-

Image used for representational purpose.

PALAKKAD: A year has passed since the tribals of Kerala’s Attappadi sent in applications for the Record of Rights (ROR) for the land under their possession in the second phase. Stipulated to be conferred under the Forest Rights Act passed in 2006, the process remains in its infancy. The reason: Forest Department personnel were pre-occupied with other duties. Therefore, joint verification of the claims with the Revenue Department has not been done.

While 25,643 persons received ROR for their landholdings in the state after the Act was passed, in Attappadi, only 282 tribals were allotted the ROR. The numbers speak of the tardy progress. These claim applications are related to land already under the tribals’ possession, for which they do not have documents. “Of the 362 claimants in the first phase, from 2009 to 2015, only 282 gained ROR for their 320.349 hectares (791.262 acres),” said KA Ramu of ‘Thampu’, which works for Attappadi tribals’ welfare.

Attappadi in numbers

ST colonies: 192 
Total Population: 
Forest Rights Committees (FRC) constituted: 108
Settlements covered in FRCs (forest villages): 122  
ROR (Record of Rights) issued to claimants in the first phase: 282 (2009-15) 
Individual applications received till date:
Rejected claims: 1,831 
ROR pending for action:
2,269 relating to individual rights 

“The remaining 80 claims, mostly in Sholayur and Pudur panchayats, were withheld by the Forest Department citing various reasons,” Ramu said, adding that from 2009 to early 2016, more than 4,382 applications were received from tribals.“Of those, 1,831 were rejected after scrutiny. Finally, 2,269 applications were accepted after the constitution of the Forest Rights Committees (FRC) and 2,167 applications have been pending before various panels,” he said.

Despite numerous reminders by the Integrated Tribal Development Project (ITDP) in Agali to the district administration, the examination of the land in possession of the tribals — needing joint verification by the Revenue and Forest departments — have not taken place.

“After joint verification, the recommendations will be forwarded to the Sub Divisional Level Committee (SLDC) headed by Ottappalam Sub-Collector and has representatives from the departments of Forest, Scheduled Tribes Development and Revenue,” said C Herald John, assistant project officer of ITDP.
“ITDP is the nodal agency. The range officer, tribal extension officer and Revenue divisional officer representing the various departments take the decision on the claims,” he said.

In the first phase, there were only 56 FRCs for 58 oorus or tribal hamlets. The SDLC had accepted only 545 claims from the 2,215 applications received. A total of 362 applications were passed while 183 were rejected. Finally, 282 claims were given ROR based on the possession certificates. In the first phase, though the District level committee had passed 80 claims, they have been withheld by the Forest Department. In some cases, on the ruse that many tribals have left the area .

  Twenty-two other claims were pending before the SLDC. Of these, 14 related to Thekke Chavadiyoor in Sholayur panchayat and eight claims were from Pudur panchayat. The authorities said the land formed part of the sandalwood re-generation area, said Ramu.

Stay up to date on all the latest The Sunday Standard news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp