Misleading ads: Only six to eye 786 firms

Data with the Ayurveda division of the Drugs Control Department shows there are only six drug inspectors to monitor cases.
Image used for representational purpose only.
Image used for representational purpose only.

KOZHIKODE:  If a behemoth like Patanjali run by Yoga guru Baba Ramdev can be brought to book on charges of misleading advertisements by a modest city court in Haridwar, then reining in small fry in Kerala seemed within bounds. So they thought, save a small hitch. The agencies here are grossly understaffed. 


Data with the Ayurveda division of the Drugs Control Department shows there are only six drug inspectors to monitor cases pertaining to 786 Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani manufacturers in the state.

It goes downhill from there. Of the six drug inspectors, four have been appointed on a temporary basis. As per the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940, one drug inspector is needed for every 10-30 companies. The primary work of a drug inspector is to put a lid on drug piracy and misleading advertisements.


The department data shows 146 cases have been lodged under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act from 2011 to 2016.

The Act prohibits claims related to the cure, treatment, or prevention of a set of 56 diseases, including diabetes, cancer, asthma and obesity, among others. Implausible as it may seem, all the cases registered under the Act are still pending in courts.

The Act prohibits advertisements of drugs and remedies that claim to have magical properties, and makes it a cognisable offence.

“The actual figure would be far greater than this,” said N Vimala, Deputy Drugs Controller. “We have sent a proposal to the state government seeking the appointment of one inspector per 30 units.  We hope they consider the demand seriously,” Vimala said.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com