Widow of assassinated Sri Lankan Tamil MP to appeal in two weeks

The five persons were accused of planning and executing the murder of the Jaffna district MP, Nadarajah Raviraj, on November 10, 2006.

Published: 25th December 2016 01:32 PM  |   Last Updated: 25th December 2016 04:38 PM   |  A+A-

Nadaraja Raviraj (File Photo)

Express News Service

COLOMBO: The widow of the assassinated Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP, Nadarajah Raviraj, will be moving the Court of Appeal against the Colombo High Court’s order acquitting five persons including Sri Lankan intelligence personnel, who were accused of planning and executing the murder of the Jaffna district MP here on November 10, 2006.

Counsel for Mrs.Raviraj, M.A.Sumanthiran, who himself is a TNA MP, told Express on Sunday, that the appeal will be filed by him within the stipulated two-week period.

The Attorney General could himself go on appeal against the verdict, but the AG does not usually challenge an acquittal in such cases where the jury had unanimously acquitted the accused, Sumanthiran said.

An all-Sinhalese Special Jury had acquitted all the five accused on grounds of lack of sufficient evidence. The judge, Manilal Waidyatilake, accepted the jury’s verdict. One of the accused had requested an all-Sinhalese jury under the ordinary Penal Code and the judge had accepted it despite objections raised by Sumanthiran.

Sumanthiran had argued that since one of the charges against the accused persons was made under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), a Special Act, there was no room for a jury trial. The Special Act should take precedence over ordinary law. But the judge did not accept this and ordered a Special Jury trial. The members of the jury were senior personnel of the public sector. He also accepted the request for an all-Sinhalese or Sinhalese knowing jury.

At the Court of Appeal Sumanthiran plans to argue that since one of the charges was under the PTA, it should have had precedence over ordinary law in conducting the trial and that the trial should have been by a judge and not a jury.

The jury had apparently gone by the evidence tendered by the Chief of Sri Lankan intelligence Senior DIG, Nilantha Jayawardena, who denied the prosecution’s contention that the intelligence services had knowledge of the plan for Raviraj’s assassination two days before it took pace.

Those accused were Prasad Chandana Kumara, Gamini Kumara, Pradeep Chaminda, Sivakanthan Vivekanandan alias Karan and Xavier Royston Christopher Hussein. Another accused Palaniswamy Suresh had died.

Three of the accused were naval intelligence personnel and these were present throughout the trial. Two others belonging to the “Karuna” faction of the now defunct LTTE, had absconded.

Stay up to date on all the latest World news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp