STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Entry of Foreign Law Firms; SC Seeks Response of Bar Council

Published: 07th April 2015 12:28 AM  |   Last Updated: 07th April 2015 12:28 AM   |  A+A-

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today sought a response from Bar Council of India (BCI) on a plea filed against the 2009 Bombay High Court verdict holding that foreign law firms cannot carry on liaison activities here without being enrolled as advocates under the Indian statute.

A bench of justices Anil R Dave and Kurian Joseph issued notice to the apex bar body BCI on the plea of Global Indian Lawyers (GIL), a society which seeks to promote global growth of the legal fraternity.

The Bombay High Court had held that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was not justified in allowing foreign law firms to open the liaison offices here in India.

The High court had also held that these offshore law firms can carry on liaison activities in India only if they enroll as advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961.

It was further held that the expression "to practice the profession of law" is wide enough to cover persons practicing in litigious matters as well as persons practicing in non-litigious matters in India.

The bench, which is also hearing a plea of BCI against a Madras High Court judgement on the issue, has now clubbed both the pleas together and fixed them for hearing on July 20.

The GIL, in its fresh plea, has said the condition that the foreign firms will have to register as advocates under the Advocates Act, is "completely erroneous".

Under the Advocates Act, it said only individual lawyers are required to be registered and not the law firms, and added that the Bombay High Court erred in assuming that the work conducted by foreign law firms in India would go unregulated.

The BCI, in separate plea, has challenged the findings of the Madras High Court on the entry of foreign law firms.

There is no bar either in the Act or the Rules for the foreign law firms or foreign lawyers to visit India for a temporary period on a fly-in, fly-out basis, for the purpose of giving legal advise to their clients in India regarding foreign law or their own system of law and on diverse international legal issues, the high court had said.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp