Now, the debate is on sensitive issues

BANGALORE: The third edition of NLS Union Debate was conducted recently, on the Nagarbhavi Campus of the National Law School of India University. An initiative of the literary and debating soc

Published: 11th January 2012 12:51 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th May 2012 06:12 PM   |  A+A-

1-NOW

Speaker at the debate competition

BANGALORE: The third edition of NLS Union Debate was conducted recently, on the Nagarbhavi Campus of the National Law School of India University. An initiative of the literary and debating society, associated with the law and society committee, the Union Debate was modelled on the Oxford and Cambridge formats and was a bid to restore falling civil consciousness and engagement. The first edition in May focused on the legitimacy of conducting hunger strikes and the second edition focused on the sub-judiced issue of legislative oversight over intelligence agencies in India.

The third edition debated ‘This House Condemns Delhi University’s Decision to Remove ‘Three Hundred Ramayanas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translations’ from its History Syllabus’” The debate started with opening remarks by Chandan Gowda, a sociologist from the University of Michigan. On this occasion, he gave some background on the essay and Delhi University’s decision to ban it. Speaking about the topic, he said that it was important to understand about the idea of a unified Ramayana or allowing heterogeneity rather than the question of secularism. The debate started with Dr Sitaramam Kakarala, Director and Senior Fellow of the Centre for the Study of Culture and Society. He addressed the issue of what knowledge and classroom learning was perceived to be and how it was an insult to the intellect of youth to believe they cannot question and understand what they read. Other speakers in the debate, discussed about the issues such as bans on controversial works and the litigation history of this case. They also questioned the validity of the assumption that undergraduate students cannot appreciate the nuances of the Ramayana.

Speakers also discussed the importance of expanding academic scope as one moves from school to college and the difference between the academic field and social field. They illustrated how it was impossible to have a single perception, not just of an essay, but also of History or the Social Sciences as a whole.

The debate concluded with the floor open to questions and the audience voting on the issue. The proposition won with 80 per cent

of the votes.

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp