Karnataka HC indicates it may issue warrant against Mallya

On October 20, a division bench ordered Mallya to be present before it on Nov 24

Published: 03rd December 2016 02:10 AM  |   Last Updated: 03rd December 2016 06:28 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: In a setback to liquor baron Vijay Mallya, the Karnataka High Court on Friday rejected his interlocutory application (IA) and indicated that it may issue warrant to secure his presence if he doesn’t appear before it on January 19.
Mallya had filed the application seeking recall of the court’s order issued on October 20, 2016, asking him to be present before it for framing of charges over the contempt petition filed by a consortium of banks. The banks had lent money to his defunct Kingfisher Airlines.
A division bench of Justice Jayant M Patel and Justice Arvind Kumar posted the case for framing of charges to January 19, after rejecting the IA. The division bench asked Mallya’s counsel to inform him about the order passed on Friday.

In his IA, Mallya contended that the High Court has no jurisdiction to exercise the power of contempt for violation of his oral undertaking given before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Benglauru. The division bench said the court can exercise its jurisdiction in terms of the power vested under Article 215 of the constitution.
Mallya also contended that the DRT was not subordinate to the High Court and hence it cannot exercise power under Contempt of Court Act for violation of his undertaking given before it.

On October 20, a division bench ordered Mallya, who is now residing in London, to be present before it in person on November 24 so that charges can be framed against him under Contempt of Courts Act.
However, instead of appearing, Mallya filed an IA seeking recall of this order.
According to the consortium of banks, when the matter was pending before the DRT as well as the High Court, they learnt from media reports that Mallya had pledged 1,04,86,666 shares of UB Ltd held by him and another 1,04,64,288 shares held jointly with his son Siddarth to Standard Chartered Bank.
The banks contended that pledging of shares was confirmed by the stock exchange and it was willful disobedience of the undertaking given by Mallya. Hence, he should be prosecuted under Contempt of Courts Act. 


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp