STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Karnataka Chief Justice drops bombshell: 'I was offered a bribe'

Published: 06th July 2016 05:19 AM  |   Last Updated: 06th July 2016 10:02 AM   |  A+A-

BENGALURU: Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee on Tuesday made the sensational disclosure that someone had offered him money in a land case.

He was hearing a revision petition filed by Umrah Developers against the Revenue Department and the Deputy Commissioner of Bengaluru Urban district. After telling the court a visitor had tried to buy a favourable verdict, he recused himself from the case.

Chief.jpgHis revelation shocked advocates in the court hall. Justice Ravi Malimath was part of the division bench headed by Mukherjee hearing cases in the post-afternoon session.

This is the second such revelation within a month in the Indian higher judiciary. On June 6, exactly a month ago, Justice K T Shankaran of the Kerala High Court had recused himself from a smuggling case, saying he had been offered money to deliver a favourable judgment.

In the Bengaluru court, when senior counsel Padmanabha V Mahale appeared to argue the land case, Mukherjee said, “Wait, wait”. He then directed his personal assistant to fetch a visiting card handed to him by a visitor to his official residence on Palace Road.

When the card was brought to the court, he flashed it to Mahale and said, “This person, who was speaking in Bengali, walked into my house yesterday. He sought a favour, offering a bribe for disposing the case listed as Serial No 34.” Stunned, Mahale informed the court the visitor had no connection with the case, and requested to see the visiting card. However, Mukherjee repeated the serial number, asked Mahale to take a photocopy of the card.

Mukherjee said, “My doors are always open. Anybody can come. But not this type. I don’t want to hear this case.”

Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee disclosed on Tuesday that he was offered money in a land case. Following this, he asked senior counsel Padmanabha V Mahale, who is arguing the land case, to make a photocopy of the visiting card that was handed to him by the person offering the bribe. Reuben Jacob, the advocate who has engaged Mahale, is yet to take a photocopy, as suggested by the judge.

The Revenue Department had auctioned 1.2 acres in 2008. Umrah Developers was the highest bidder, and paid the full amount of ` 2.1 crore.

The land had been acquired by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for formation of the Kempegowda Layout. As a result, the developers neither got the land nor the money back. The developers then approached the High Court. A single-judge bench ordered the BDA to provide alternative land to Umrah Developers.

The Revenue Department filed an appeal against the order. A division bench said the petitioner could not claim alternative land as a matter of right, and ordered the BDA to refund the money with interest. But the BDA did not comply with this order either.

Umrah Developers then filed a contempt petition. The Revenue Department returned the principal but not the mandated interest of 7.5 per cent a year. The developers filed a revision petition, seeking restoration of the single-judge order on the grant of alternative land.

“Since one of us is not inclined to take up this matter on personal grounds, let this matter go out of the list,” said an order hosted on the High Court website on Tuesday.

 



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp