Richard III's Innocence Found in Sterlised Room

For lovers of history, art and crime, \'The Daughter of Time\' is a packed read.

Published: 23rd March 2016 07:23 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd March 2016 07:23 AM   |  A+A-

BENGALURU: What do you do when you find that a book you have not heard about at all is at the  top (or nearabouts) in all of the lists of greatest detective / mystery books of all-time?

You read it, of course.

So I read Josephine Tey’s ‘The Daughter of Time’.

Richard.jpgThe protagonist, Alan Grant, Inspector of the Scotland Yard, has had a broken leg while trying to apprehend a criminal. While recuperating in hospital, he is bored with the same old people, the same old food, and the same old books. Fiction does not interest him, and the nurses are well-meaning but staid conversation companions.

Seeing his plight, his actress friend, Marta Hallard suggests he look at some portraits —Grant takes pride in being able to identify criminals by looking at their faces. This interest in faces, supposedly, allows him ‘both a private entertainment and a professional advantage’. Marta gets him a few portraits to look at, and one particular face interests him the most. It is the most ‘individual’ of faces, one of a person used to great responsibility and authority, yet that of a worrier, perhaps even a perfectionist.

Richarda.jpgThe face is of Richard III, the (in)famous last Plantagenet king of England, from the House of York, before he is overthrown by Henry VIII, the first of the Tudors.

And as readers of Shakespeare would know, he was the villain that killed his nephews, the sons of Edward V, the previous king of England, to negate their royal claims.

Inspector Grant, though, is not convinced ­—that noble, responsible face cannot be that of a murderer. So he immerses himself in the historical mystery of the ‘Princes in the Tower’. Grant is not a historian by any stretch of the imagination - but he educated himself, progressing from school books to quasi-historical tales to proper historic tomes - and in the meantime, becomes friendly with a researcher, who does some of the heavy lifting in terms of fact-checking. So did Richard III kill his nephews? And if he didn’t, who did?

This is one of the best books of pure detection that I have ever read, and I have read a fair few. See, this is a historical mystery that takes place entirely out of a hospital room. There is zero action, and the tone is very unlike a detective novel in being humorous and light. Yet, the prose is sparkling, the writing even, gripping, and Ms. Tey performs the miracle of making us believe that we can extract truth from the bosom of time through a library card, an analytical mind and common sense.

Incidentally, after its publication in 1951, there has been new interest in the ‘Princes in the Tower’, and apparently there are many historians who are now convinced of Richard III’s innocence of the crime. The book is nothing like anything I have read earlier. I loved it ­—it’s completely  worthy of all the adulation. And thank God for those best-of lists.

The writer has published stories in Quarterly Literary Review Singapore.

India Matters


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp