STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Occupancy Certificate not must for flat owners to get power: HC

“Occupancy Certificate has to be obtained by the developer/builder from the BBMP. However, insisting individual flat owners to produce Occupancy Certificate as a condition for obtaining the power conn

Published: 15th September 2017 03:36 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th September 2017 07:02 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: “Occupancy Certificate has to be obtained by the developer/builder from the BBMP. However, insisting individual flat owners to produce Occupancy Certificate as a condition for obtaining the power connection would be per se illegal. They may be the consumers or applicants, and not have any access or right to obtain such occupancy certificates from the municipal bodies like Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike,” said Karnataka High Court.

Justice Dr Vineet Kothari passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by BBMP. The BBMP Commissioner had challenged the order dated April 9, 2015 passed by Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that power distribution companies could not insist on the consumers to prove their occupation of the premises by providing the ‘Occupancy Certificate’.

The KERC passed this order on receiving a complaint by Vidyuth Grahakara Hitarakshana Vedike, a consumer association, and Karnataka State Licensed Electrical Contractors Association.
During the hearing, the BBMP counsel brought to the notice of the court that the Urban Development Department (UDD) had issued the order stating that the BWSSB and KTPCL authorities should not provide new water supply and electricity supply without Occupancy Certificate/No Objection Certificate from the Bangalore Development Authority/BBMP. If water and electricity connections are provided without No Objection/Occupancy certificate from BWSSB or through KPTCL, action will be initiated against the Executive Engineer concerned, it added.

The UDD ordered the Commissioners of BBMP and BDA to issue Occupancy Certificates only to those buildings which do not violate the KMC Act.On hearing this, Justice Kothari said that the court was satisfied that the conditions of supply regulations do not require the Occupancy Certificate to be issued by respective municipal bodies.

The KERC is the sole authority and it has rightly held in the impugned order that the proof of ownership and occupation of the premises in question can be proved by any consumer or applicant seeking the power connection in the manner stipulated in the Conditions of Supply (CoS), read with Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the judge said.

“In absence of any amendment of the relevant bye-laws or CoS, the state government should not have asked the distribution companies to insist on the ‘Occupancy Certificate’ by consumers in a multi-storey building, where the Occupancy Certificate has to be obtained by the developer/builder,” the judge said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp