STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

No High Court relief for Vijay Mallya

Recalling Mallya’s contention that all his properties and money have been under freezing orders of courts in India and UK, the High court said that the order does not avail to him.

Published: 06th October 2018 05:33 AM  |   Last Updated: 06th October 2018 05:33 AM   |  A+A-

Vijay Mallya

Vijay Mallya. (File | PTI)

By Express News Service

BENGALURU:  In a setback to proclaimed offender Dr Vijay Mallya, the Karnataka High Court on Friday dismissed the writ petitions filed by him challenging the order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which asked him to deposit Rs 3,101 crore.“....The facts prima facie discredit the petitioner’s (Mallya) version that he does not have any money to deposit,” a division bench of Chief Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Krishna S Dixit said, while upholding the DRAT order. 

Recalling Mallya’s contention that all his properties and money have been under freezing orders of courts in India and UK, the High court said that the order does not avail to him. It also said that Mallya is said to have received Rs 260 crore from Diageo.  As on the date of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) order, there was no freezing order by courts in UK. Instead, the freezing order was passed about 10 months after the order passed by the DRT. 

Mallya has approached the DRAT against the order of Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) Bengaluru, which directed him to pay Rs 6,203.35 crore on May 31, 2013, with a 15.20 interest rate per annum to the consortium of banks led by SBI. 

Referring to the arguments of the counsel of the consortium of banks, the High Court said that the Supreme Court in its order dated April 26, 2016 observed that Mallya did not disclose his assets abroad despite its direction. It also said that there was no bonafide in his offer for settlement of the dues. 
Mallya and UBHCL are jointly liable to pay the amount.

Case historY
Vijay Mallya moved the HC seeking to quash the order dated March 28, 2018 passed by DRAT, Chennai. The DRAT dismissed his appeal on January 2, 2018 for want of appearance and for non compliance of office objections. Then Mallya filed an application before the DRAT seeking restoration of his appeal and another application for condoning delay.    

After hearing this, the DRAT directed him to deposit D3,101 crore on or before April 25, 2018. It also made it clear that the appeal would be liable to be dismissed if he failed to deposit the money. Mallya then filed an interlocutory application seeking to extend deadline but it was dismissed by DRAT. Mallya moved the Karnataka HC against this order. 



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp