HAL worker fails to repay R8L to colleague, convicted

The Karnataka High Court convicted a Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) worker for not repaying a loan to his colleague.

Published: 04th December 2019 06:52 AM  |   Last Updated: 04th December 2019 06:52 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court convicted a Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) worker for not repaying a loan to his colleague.“The accused R Prasad is liable to be convicted for offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,” said Justice R Devdas in the judgment dated November 26. The accused will have to pay Rs 9 lakh, of which Rs 1 lakh will go to the state as fine, and Rs 8 lakh to the complainant, BA Sathisha.

Sathisha filed a criminal appeal against a judgment dated February 14, 2018, passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. The magistrate had rejected Sathisha’s complaint on the grounds that he had not obtained any permission from the higher authorities at HAL before lending money to Prasad.
Prasad had sought a hand loan of Rs 8 lakh from Sathisha to treat his brother, who had met with a road accident in 2014. Later, in order to show that he had the money, Prasad produced copies of sale deeds of a property he had sold. Prasad issued a cheque to Sathisha for Rs 8 lakh to repay the debt, but the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.

Sathisha then filed a private complaint before the magistrate. Holding that the complainant could not have lent a huge amount without permission from the higher authorities, as per Disciplinary Rules, the magistrate had dismissed the complaint.

The complainant then filed an appeal before the High Court on the grounds that the HAL Conduct, Disciplinary and Appeal Rules were applicable only to Grade-I Officers and above, and not to workmen.
After hearing both parties, the HC said the magistrate had wrongly applied provisions of the Conduct Rules of HAL as the parties were not officers. “The magistrate, while dealing with a matter under the Negotiable Instruments Act, is in no way concerned with permission required to be taken from the higher authority. Therefore, this court proceeds to hold that the order passed by the magistrate cannot be sustained,” the high court said. 

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp