High court asks details of action taken on plaints

Kumar also drew the attention of the court to the alleged objectionable provocative remarks made by police officers against protesters. 

Published: 05th February 2020 06:41 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th February 2020 06:41 AM   |  A+A-

Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court (File Photo | Debdutta Mitra, EPS)

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday directed Advocate General (AG) Prabhuling K Navadgi to file an affidavit outlining the action taken on complaints filed by people injured as well as the family members of the deceased during the police firing in Mangaluru in which two people were killed.

Hearing a PIL filed by former Mangaluru mayor K Ashraf and H S Doreswamy, freedom fighter, a division bench of Chief Justice Abhay Shreeniwas Oka and Justice Hemant Chandangoudar also directed the Deputy Commissioner/District Magistrate of Dakshina Kannada district to publish a notice asking the public, private and media to produce CCTV and video footage of the anti-CAA protest on December 19, 2019.

“The state should ascertain whether the footage of the video recorded by the police and city administration is available,” the bench said, directing the District Magistrate to place the footage on record before the court, if it is available, on February 25, the next date of hearing. This was after senior counsel Ravivarma Kumar representing the petitioners submitted that the police had not registered a single case on the complaints filed by the injured and family members of the deceased. When the bench sought an answer, the AG said that endorsements had been given to all complainants. 

Kumar also drew the attention of the court to the alleged objectionable provocative remarks made by police officers against protesters. The AG said the CCTV footage was kept intact according to the interim directions of the court. He also submitted a copy of the preliminary inquiry in a sealed cover to the court. The AG also argued that two petitioners, who have filed a separate PIL over the anti-CAA Mangaluru protest, had suppressed facts about criminal cases pending against them. 

He submitted that seven criminal cases were pending against IK Mohammed Iqbal Elimale and five criminal cases pending against B Ummer. Both petitioners are residents of Devachalla village and Gandhi Nagar respectively, in Sullia taluk of Dakshina Kannada district.They had also said in their petition that they were social activists working for the protection of fundamental rights of people. However, the court found no such activities undertaken by them in the documents they submitted.The bench declined to entertain the PIL, noting that the petitioners had filed false and incorrect statements and therefore, they cannot be treated as pro bono litigants.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp