Environmental activists oppose draft EIA, suggest 30 points be added

UCM members said public consultation should be mandatory instead of optional as the draft notification proposes.

Published: 30th June 2020 07:02 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th June 2020 07:02 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: City-based environmentalists have strongly objected to the draft Environment Impact Assessment 2020, saying it dilutes many of the protections given to the environment in the EIA notification of 2006.The United Conservation Movement has submitted its response to the union government, which had sought responses from the public when the draft notification was released in March. It has sought the removal of 22 provisions and instead offered 30 suggestions for inclusion. 

UCM members said public consultation should be mandatory instead of optional as the draft notification proposes. They were also strongly opposed to ex-post facto (clearances with retrospective effect), which the Supreme Court had struck down in the Alembic Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Vs Rohit Prajapati and others case.

They also said industries should continue to be classified in terms of red, orange and green, based on their pollution levels (the most polluting industries come under the red category). The draft seeks to replace this classification with categories A (which would include more polluting industries), while industries which pollute less would be classified under B1 or B2, and require fewer clearances. However, UCM pointed out that some highly polluting industries such as acid manufacturing and chemical processing had been moved to B1 or B2 with no explanation. The draft notification seeks to exempt around 40 types of industries, currently classified as red, from obtaining prior environmental clearance.

Other dilutions include permitting red and orange category industries to operate as close as 5km from protected areas (PA), from the 10km distance specified by the of the 2006 EIA.The draft also seeks to increase the validity of environmental clearance (EC) for mining from 30 years to 50, and for river valley, irrigation and nuclear projects from 10 years to 15, and for all other projects from five years to 10. Stating that environmental protection cannot be diluted or compromised for ease of doing business, UCM said, “Priority should be on protecting of environment.” They also demanded that Section 26 of the draft notification which allows for EIA exemption be scrapped. 


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp