Land cannot be taken away without invoking acquisition law: Karnataka High Court

The state government contended that the authorities submitted that some landowners agreed and accordingly gave up their lands by executing relinquishment deeds.

Published: 26th January 2023 10:20 AM  |   Last Updated: 26th January 2023 10:20 AM   |  A+A-

Karnataka High Court (Photo | EPS)

Karnataka High Court (Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: Lands cannot be taken away by the state and authorities without invoking provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, said the Karnataka High Court, partly allowing a batch of petitions filed by several people from Shivamogga against taking away their lands forcibly by the local authorities to expand a road.

The court said that if others have given up their land, that cannot be a legal ground to compel the petitioners to surrender their properties too, since the constitutional guarantee is available to the property of individuals and not necessarily a collection of individuals. Making these observations, Justice Krishna S Dixit restrained the authorities from interfering with the properties of KV Srinivas Rao and other petitioners till they are acquired as per the provisions of the said Act.

The petitioners’ counsel argued that the right to property, though not a fundamental right, is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 300A and his clients, who are the land owners, cannot be compelled to give up their properties except in accordance with the law. His clients are not agreeable to relinquishing their properties. If at all the state wants these properties, the acquisition process under the 2013 Act is the only option, he argued.

The state government contended that the authorities submitted that some landowners agreed and accordingly gave up their lands by executing relinquishment deeds. This course is open to the petitioners as well, where the compensation payable would be three times the guidance value keeping in view the provisions of the 2013 Act. By contending in this manner, they both seek dismissal of the writ petitions, the government advocate argued.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp