Fictional 'fix' or filmy obsession?

Published: 31st July 2013 08:59 AM  |   Last Updated: 31st July 2013 02:13 PM   |  A+A-


Dissecting seven books and turning them into eight immensely successful movies was possibly one of the biggest stunts the English film industry has pulled off in recent times – even counting the Lord of The Rings series. So it’s natural that there will be discrepancies in the way the books are translated. And equally natural that there are hordes of disgruntled fans, unhappy with the way certain things turned out in the movies.

From missing characters and wrong character traits to tiny niggles in the storyline, fans gave out a long laundry list of things that they were disappointed with in the films. And top of the laundry list was Albus Dumbledore, the Headmaster of the magic school.

The portrayal of Dumbledore – the ever calm and composed Headmaster with a perpetual twinkle in his eye – was disappointing, “Michael Gambon was the exact opposite of calm and composed in that movie – in one scene, he took Harry by the neck and actually screamed at him, when the book says he was calm at that point. The movies just ruined Dumbledore,” says Mala Rajan who has been a fan of the books since 1997.

For some, Michael Gambon as Dumbledore just didn’t sit well after seeing the late Richard Harris portray him perfectly in the first two movies. Harris, who was already in failing health, passed away just after the release of the second movie, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.

“Dumbledore was supposed to be this wise wizard in control of every situation and they turned him into ‘Grouchy old man who lives across the street’. The battle between Dumbledore and Voldemort in the Ministry of Magic was epic in the book and a mess on film. Similarly Ralph just wasn’t menacing enough as Voldemort.  He wasn’t physically intimidating. His backstory was horribly butchered in the sixth movie. Nope. Not the villain a story of this magnitude needed,” fumes Rohit P, an Engineering student.

Another irritant for the fans is the sixth movie, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. Though the lead characters have immense pressure and responsibilities, the book was lighter than its predecessors – there was a lot of adolescent romance, angst and of course, Rowling’s humour. But this didn’t translate well on the screen.

“The most infuriating omission probably was excluding Dumbledore’s funeral scene. For me, it was one of the most moving scenes in the series and they just ignored it!” says Shantanu Adhicary, a software engineer.

Fans also unanimously agree that the omission of Dumbledore’s past, which made up such a huge part of book seven, was a grave error. “It explains so many things and ties up so many loose ends. I was so disappointed that it was completely excluded,” says Mala, while Shantanu continues with, “The final battle between Harry and Voldemort is also not filmi enough for my taste. The scene in the book was way better. The action happens in front of almost the whole wizarding world, not in some shady corner of the castle.”

Shady corner of the castle or not, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2 was one of the biggest blockbusters in the movie universe, getting to one billion dollars in the shortest of times. And together, the whole franchise earned of $7.7 billion worldwide. How’s that for some change?

Stay up to date on all the latest Chennai news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp