STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Revised GO fixing minimum standards for old age homes

The Tamil Nadu government has brought out a fresh GO last week, revising minimum and essential standards for old age homes run by NGOs.

Published: 28th November 2016 11:18 PM  |   Last Updated: 28th November 2016 11:18 PM   |  A+A-

senior citizens

Image for representational purpose only.

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: The Tamil Nadu government has brought out a fresh GO last week, revising minimum and essential standards for old age homes run by Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs), the first bench of Madras High Court was informed on Monday.

When a PIL from S Krishnamurthy of T Nagar, praying for a direction to the authorities to frame regulations and appoint a regulatory authority to monitor the functioning of senior citzen homes within a time frame, came up before Chief Justice SK Kaul and Justice R Mahadevan, Government Pleader MK Subramanian told the judges that 30 suggestions given by persons having interest in the field have been incorporated in the new GO issued by the Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme on November 23.

In all, 57 suggestions had been received from the interested persons, which included the petitioner, the union government and the State Social Welfare director and only 30 were found to be relevant. The GO would be implemented with immediate effect, he submitted.

Expressing satisfaction,the petitioner, however, suggested that there should be a sincere endeavour to inspect the existing homes to ensure that they are compliant and efforts made to locate the unregistered homes and they should be visited for consequences of non-registration.

The GP assured the bench that on both the aspects, serious effort would be made. Appreciating the constructive role of the State government and the counsel for the State and Central governments and the petitioner in taking up the issue, the bench closed the PIL.

The November 23 GO followed the earlier GO dated February 9 last, which had been rejected by the petitioner and the bench on the ground that it was not comprehensive enough to deal with all issues.

At times, if accountability of the home was questioned, food supplied to senior citizens was stopped and they were harassed, petitioner had alleged.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

edexworks
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp