Sexually harassed woman cop gets Rs 5 Lakh compensation

Rajasekaran was, however, found guilty of causing the complainant mental distress by issuing adverse remarks which led to her transfer from Ilayangudi to Thiruvadanai.

Published: 05th September 2018 03:16 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th September 2018 03:16 AM   |  A+A-

Image used for representational purpose only.

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: The State Human Rights Commission has ordered Rs 5 lakh compensation for a woman Sub-Inspector of Police, who was allegedly sexually harassed by an ‘influential’ head constable and given punishment transfers when she raised the issue with her higher-ups.

The order issued by commission member D Jayachandran has recommended dismissal of A Senthamarai Kannan, then head constable in the special branch CID in Sivagangai district and initiation of disciplinary action against N Rajasekaran, then Superintendent of Police in Sivaganga district.

The complainant was working as a Sub-Inspector in the Sipcot police station, Manamadurai in 2009 when Senthamarai Kannan, special branch CID head constable in charge of the Manamadurai division of Sivaganga, had allegedly spoken to her with bad intentions and was spreading rumours about her.

She had complained that Senthamarai Kannan had spread rumours that he had brought her to the SIPCOT police station from Manamadurai and that she was her concubine. She also claimed that he had also lurked outside her house in which she was residing with her husband.

The woman SI had also allegedly undergone mental torture at the hands of the then SP Rajasekaran who, she said,  refused to accept her complaint about Senthamarai Kannan’s behaviour in 2009 and had asked her father to approach the Deputy Superintendent of Police, instead.

The complainant’s father eventually lodged a complaint with the Inspector-General of Police, South Zone in 2010,with no avail. However, a newspaper reported the issue and highlighted the sexual harassment faced by women police in Sivaganga.

When the then DSP incharge Padmavathy finally called for an enquiry, the complainant claimed to have been threatened for speaking to the press despite her denial. She then received a memo in June 2010 and was allegedly transferred to the Ilayangudi police station as a punishment.

Based on a preliminary report submitted by Inspector General of Police Srilakshmi Prasad, oral and documentary evidences provided and arguments submitted by the counsels, the commission found Senthamarai Kannan guilty of sexual harassment. However, the complainant has failed to prove the
allegations against Rajasekaran.

Rajasekaran was, however, found guilty of causing the complainant mental distress by issuing adverse remarks which led to her transfer from Ilayangudi to Thiruvadanai.

Hence, the commission

recommended dismissal of Senthamarai Kannan and disciplinary action against Rajasekaran based on the findings. It also directed the state government to deduct `3 lakh of the compensation amount from Senthamarai Kannan and `2 lakh from Rajasekaran.

The SHRC has recommended promotion for the complainant after finding the transfers vindictive and has also directed the Director General of Police to take suitable action whenever complaints are received from women police personnel.

Stay up to date on all the latest Chennai news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp