'Unauthorised layout': Olive Beach bungalows along Chennai's Muttukadu coastline termed illegal

Madras High Court on Thursday ordered the disconnection of power supply to one of the bungalows after Mamallapuram Local Planning Authority termed the bungalows illegal.

Published: 29th November 2019 06:37 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th November 2019 10:55 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

CHENNAI: It’s a ‘Maradu moment’ of sorts for Chennai, as the posh Olive Beach bungalows along the Muttukadu coastline, have been termed as illegal. The layout, located between the Muttukadu lagoon backwaters and Bay of Bengal, is on the no-development zone, as per the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) classification. The submission was made in the report tabled by K Chandrasekar, member secretary of Mamallapuram Local Planning Authority, in the Madras High Court on Thursday. The court has ordered disconnection of power supply to one of the bungalows, which had illegally placed groynes along the shoreline to protect the building from coastal erosion. 

The authorities inspected the layout on November 22, and observed that the ‘unauthorised layout’ was formed in the no-development zone —within 200 metres from the High Tide Line of the CRZ. “About 50 plots were existing within the 10 metre tar road in the unauthorised layout,” the report said.

Unauthorised construction notice was issued to
few Olive Beach building owners in October
8, 2012 | Shiba Prasad sahu 

Express has published a series of articles on illegal constructions along the Muttukadu coast by influential persons, including Kollywood actors. These constructions seem to have worsened the coastal erosion along this region, with a couple of Olive Beach bungalows having already been reduced to rubble. To curb erosion, a wall was constructed illegally by the owners.

As per records, an unauthorised construction notice was issued to few Olive Beach building owners in October 8, 2012. Subsequently, the buildings were sealed on December 22, 2012. Out of six owners, three obtained interim injunction and two filed writ petitions. Another report prepared by assistant executive engineer of Department of Environment, also concluded that the entire layout (S.No 113 & 114) falls within CRZ-III area, where no construction can be permitted except repairs and reconstruction of existing authorised structures between 0-200 meters of HTL of sea for which prior clearance from Tamil Nadu State Coastal Zone Management Authority must be obtained. 

The Madras High Court bench, comprising Justices M Sathyanarayanan and N Seshasayee, took the reports on record and impleaded the Principal Secretary of Public Works Department. Meanwhile, evidence based on geo-mapping done of the area from 2005 disclosed that many constructions, prima facie, appear to be unauthorised and in violation of the CRZ.  

“Despite the subsistence of interim orders from 2013 and 2014, the concerned official respondents have not taken steps to vacate the interim orders, which prima facie appears that the concerned officials are in the act of connivance and collusion with the concerned persons, who are alleged to have put up unauthorised illegal structures right in the Bay of Bengal, in utter violation and disregard of CRZ Notification,” the bench said.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp