STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Madras High Court issues notice to music composer AR Rahman over alleged tax evasion

The allegation is that the money had been transferred to the AR Rahman Foundation, which did not have a Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) licence then

Published: 11th September 2020 04:15 PM  |   Last Updated: 11th September 2020 04:15 PM   |  A+A-

Oscar-winner AR Rahman

Musician AR Rahman (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: A division bench of the Madras High Court on Friday issued a notice to music composer AR Rahman in a case filed by the Income Tax department alleging that he routed income of over Rs 3 crore through the A R Rahman Foundation, a charitable trust managed by him, to evade tax.

The Income Tax Department moved the Madras High Court challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, verdict that set aside the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax in Chennai.

According to senior standing counsel for the Income Tax department T R Senthil Kumar, in the assessment year 2011-12, Rahman received income to the tune of Rs 3.47 crore in connection with an agreement made with the UK based Libra Mobiles.

The contract was to compose exclusive ringtones for the company and the term of the contract was for three years. As per the contract, Rahman instructed the company to pay his remuneration directly to the foundation managed by him, the department said.

The allegation is that the money had been transferred to the Foundation, which did not have a Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) licence then.

“The taxable income must be received by Rahman and after due deduction of tax, it can be transferred to the trust. But the same cannot be routed through the trust as income to the charitable trust is exempted under the Income Tax Act,” the counsel said.

According to the petition filed by the Income Tax department, Rahman after receiving the IT notice had moved the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Chennai and the tribunal in September 2019 had then held that the government of India had accorded “post facto approval” with respect to this contribution. The tribunal ruled in favour of Rahman finding that the amount was not taxable.

The division bench of justices TS Sivagnanam and V Bhavani Subbaroyan recorded the submissions made by the IT department and issued a notice to the music composer.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp