STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Special court accepts CBI clean chit to Rakesh Asthana

‘Middleman’ Manoj Prasad summoned along with his brother Someshwar Srivastava and father-in-law Sunil Mittal on April 13

Published: 08th March 2020 10:25 AM  |   Last Updated: 08th March 2020 10:25 AM   |  A+A-

Former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana was embroiled in a bribery case lodged by the agency

Former CBI special director Rakesh Asthana was embroiled in a bribery case lodged by the agency | file

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Saturday said there was not sufficient evidence to summon former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) special director Rakesh Asthana in a bribery case lodged by the agency.
Special Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal observed while taking cognisance of a charge sheet filed by the CBI, in which Asthana’s name was mentioned in Column 12. Column 12 means there is not enough evidence to make a person an accused. The court made a similar observation about CBI Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Devender Kumar, who was arrested by the agency in 2018 and later got bail. His name was also mentioned in Column 12 of the charge sheet.

The court, however, summoned “middleman” Manoj Prasad, who was arrayed as an accused in the charge sheet. It also summoned Prasad’s brother Someshwar Srivastava and father-in-law, Sunil Mittal, saying there was sufficient material to proceed against them. Both Srivastava’s and Mittal’s name had cropped up during the probe. The court directed Prasad, Srivastava and Mittal to appear before it on April 13.

 “There is sufficient evidence to proceed against Manoj Prasad, Someshwar Srivastava and Sunil Mittal. I summon them for April 13. Rakesh Asthana and Devender Kumar are not being summoned since there is no sufficient evidence against them,” the judge said. The CBI may file a charge sheet if it finds anything against Asthana in its ongoing probe, Aggarwal said. The judge took cognisance of the charge sheet filed 
under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 420 (cheating) and 385 (extortion) of the Indian Penal Code and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

The court was earlier told by the former investigating officer of the case, A K Bassi, that there were “clinching evidence” against Asthana. The charge sheet, filed on February 11, had only arrayed Prasad as an accused. Asthana and Kumar were named in Column 12 of the charge sheet in the case since there was not enough evidence to make them accused. Suspended DSP Kumar was the investigating officer in a 2017 case involving meat exporter Moin Qureshi.    

Former investigating officer not so sure
Special Judge Sanjeev Aggarwal took cognisance of the charge sheet filed under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 420 (cheating) and 385 (extortion) of IPC and provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court was earlier told by a former investigating officer, that there were “clinching evidence” against Asthana.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp