STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

‘Common sense prevails over charges’: Court on Delhi riots probe

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav discharged 22-year-old Javed for the offence of causing 'mischief by fire or explosive substance'.

Published: 10th September 2021 04:09 AM  |   Last Updated: 10th September 2021 09:09 AM   |  A+A-

Delhi Riots

Protesters during clashes in Northeast Delhi. (File Photo | Parveen Negi, EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Discharging a man accused in the north-east Delhi riots, a Delhi court said that even though communal riots cases have to be considered with sensitivity, common sense should not be given a go-by.

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav discharged 22-year-old Javed for the offence of causing “mischief by fire or explosive substance”, after noting that the complainant’s statements do not show that the particular act was committed.

The judge said, “This court is conscious of the fact that cases of communal riots have to be considered with utmost sensitivity, but that does not mean that the common sense should be given go-by; mind has to be applied even at this stage with regard to the material available on record.” 

Javed was arrested in April 2020 based on complaints filed by four people who claimed that their house, godown and shops were vandalised and looted by a riotous mob on February 25, 2020.

The judge observed however that there were no eyewitnesses, CCTV footage or photographs of the incident.

He also took note of the fact that the complainant did not state a single word regarding mischief by fire or explosive substance by the mob.

“I’m afraid that the investigating agency cannot cover up the said flaw by way of recording the supplementary statements of complainants, if the ingredient(s) of section 436 IPC [mischief by fire] was not there in their initial written complaints made to the police,” ASJ Yadav said.

“I am of the considered view that ingredients of Section 436 IPC are not at all made out from the material produced on record by the investigating agency. Except Section 436 IPC, all the offences invoked in the matter are exclusively triable by the court of learned Magistrate,” he added.

Communal clashes had broken out in north-east Delhi in February 2020.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp