STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

I retaliated as accused fired first: Inspector Lal Madhar on Shadnagar encounter

Madhar also said he did not know if the accused in the case were caught by the police in a record time and if the police were applauded for arresting the accused.

Published: 29th October 2021 08:50 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th October 2021 08:50 AM   |  A+A-

Encounter, Police

Image used for representational purpose only

Express News Service

HYDERABAD: Inspector Shaik Lal Madhar, who was part of the police party that ‘fired’ at the accused in the rape and murder of a veterinarian at Shadnagar in 2019, said he could not he say if case was a gruesome and sensational offence.

Madhar also said he did not know if the accused in the case were caught by the police in a record time and if the police were applauded for arresting the accused. He made the statements in front of the judicial commission on Thursday. 

He also stated, “I do not know”, when asked the purpose for which the commission was appointed and if the accused could have been brought to court for a final verdict.

“ACP Surender was looking after it (the rape and murder case),” said Lal Madhar when asked if the police had not thought all precautions should have been taken to keep the accused alive for a final verdict.

Lal Madhar, who was armed with an AK-47 at the time of the incident, said that he was instructed by the ACP not to target the accused while they ran away. He was told only to fire in the direction of the sound of firing, to divert the accused’s attention and apprehend them. 

When Lal Madhar said, he ‘did know’ the purpose for which the accused snatched the weapons from the police and ran, the panel asked, “Why did you shoot if you did not know why they were running away?”

Since they were firing at the police party, ACP had given him instructions, he said. When the commission further questioned him, “If the intention of the accused was to escape, why did they not run, particularly when they knew there were many policemen with weapons and there was no possibility of standing and firing at the police party?” Lal Madhar said he ‘did not know’.

‘I don’t know’, his standard reply

Cop who was party of ‘encounter’ sticks to standard reply of ‘I don’t know’ to several replies by judicial commission. Especially when asked if he didn’t think it was necessary to keep the arrested accused alive for a final court verdict  



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp